IA/NH/SC-Marist: 3-way Pub race
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 07:32:58 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  IA/NH/SC-Marist: 3-way Pub race
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: IA/NH/SC-Marist: 3-way Pub race  (Read 1133 times)
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 15, 2015, 09:10:52 AM »

IA: Huck 17%, Jeb 16%, Walker 15%. NH: Jeb 18%, Walker 15%, Rand 14%, Christie 13%. SC: Graham 17%, Jeb 15%, Walker 12%, Huck/Carson 10%.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,708
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2015, 09:28:23 AM »

Huckabee is the one G O Per I would tolerate as the nominee, Walker and Jeb, I have a hard time with. Go Huck.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2015, 09:29:53 AM »

Iowa:

http://newscms.nbcnews.com/sites/newscms/files/iowa_february_2015_annotated_questionnaire_nbc_news-marist_poll.pdf

Dems:

Clinton 68%
Biden 12%
Sanders 7%
Webb 1%
O'Malley 0%

GOP:

Huckabee 17%
Bush 16%
Walker 15%
Christie 9%
Paul 7%
Rubio 6%
Carson 6%
Santorum 5%
Perry 4%
Cruz 2%
Graham 1%

NH:

http://newscms.nbcnews.com/sites/newscms/files/new_hampshire_february_2015_annotated_questionnaire_nbc_news-marist_poll.pdf

Dems:

Clinton 68%
Sanders 13%
Biden 8%
Webb 2%
O'Malley 0%

GOP:

Bush 18%
Walker 15%
Paul 14%
Christie 13%
Huckabee 7%
Carson 7%
Cruz 6%
Rubio 6%
Perry 1%
Graham 1%
Santorum 1%

SC:

http://newscms.nbcnews.com/sites/newscms/files/south_carolina_february_2015_annotated_questionnaire_nbc_news-marist_poll.pdf

Dems:

Clinton 65%
Biden 20%
Sanders 3%
O'Malley 2%
Webb 2%

GOP:

Graham 17%
Bush 15%
Walker 12%
Huckabee 10%
Carson 10%
Paul 7%
Christie 6%
Rubio 4%
Perry 4%
Santorum 3%
Cruz 1%
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2015, 09:31:58 AM »

Graham certainly has a better chance at the nod than Perry, Santorum and Jindal imo.
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,746
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2015, 12:36:54 PM »

#Sandersmentum
#Lindseymentum

Is this the first time the Bernie Sanders has gotten second place?

As much as I hate that Warren push poll, it would be interesting to see the same for Sanders.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2015, 12:54:38 PM »

#LOLRubio

He's not running for the ump-teenth time. He'd be a fool, and he'd likely lose the Senate seat after a national embarrassment.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2015, 12:56:18 PM »

Walker and Bush are peaking way too early.

Don't think they can maintain this lead for another year and a couple months ...
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2015, 01:37:18 PM »

Hard to believe...  
- Lindseymentum in SC? Seriously?
- Huckabee 1st in Iowa? Tied with Walker and JEB (lol)?

What is hard to believe about those things?

Because it is absolutely inconsistent with what previous polls showed. Also, #muhMarist showed a dead heat in Arkansas in 2014.

It isn't really...another poll from earlier showed Lindsey in second in SC (only 1 point behind first).

Huckabee does well in Iowa in every poll taken: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/ia/iowa_republican_presidential_caucus-3194.html
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2015, 01:43:02 PM »

Thank you Marist for not including Warren!

Looks like most of her support actually goes to Hillary, big shocker! Not. Hillary isn't in the same position as Romney, with tons of voters looking for an "anti-Hillary" and will move from candidate to candidate in order to find them. This is exactly why Warren was the only one who had a prayer of defeating her. But #keephopealive for Jim Webb guys! LOL

I'm starting to feel bad for Biden. I mean, the sitting VP in third place in NH behind a 73 year old socialist with much lower name recognition? That's rough.

#Lindseymentum confirmed. And you guys doubted me...
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2015, 05:12:17 PM »

Thank you Marist for not including Warren!

Looks like most of her support actually goes to Hillary, big shocker! Not. Hillary isn't in the same position as Romney, with tons of voters looking for an "anti-Hillary" and will move from candidate to candidate in order to find them. This is exactly why Warren was the only one who had a prayer of defeating her. But #keephopealive for Jim Webb guys! LOL

I'm starting to feel bad for Biden. I mean, the sitting VP in third place in NH behind a 73 year old socialist with much lower name recognition? That's rough.

#Lindseymentum confirmed. And you guys doubted me...

Breaking News: IceSpear admits that he believes Elizabeth Warren can defeat Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination in 2016!
Logged
PPT Spiral
Spiral
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,534
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2015, 05:22:46 PM »

SC seems to be more evidence that brothers love Joe
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2015, 05:55:04 PM »

Thank you Marist for not including Warren!

Looks like most of her support actually goes to Hillary, big shocker! Not. Hillary isn't in the same position as Romney, with tons of voters looking for an "anti-Hillary" and will move from candidate to candidate in order to find them. This is exactly why Warren was the only one who had a prayer of defeating her. But #keephopealive for Jim Webb guys! LOL

I'm starting to feel bad for Biden. I mean, the sitting VP in third place in NH behind a 73 year old socialist with much lower name recognition? That's rough.

#Lindseymentum confirmed. And you guys doubted me...

Breaking News: IceSpear admits that he believes Elizabeth Warren can defeat Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination in 2016!

Not really breaking, I've always said that. If Warren ran, I'd give Hillary about 90-10 odds. Everyone else has a 0% chance unless she dies. But since Warren is almost certainly not running, that rounds Hillary up to a ~99% chance of being the Democratic nominee.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2015, 05:59:21 PM »

SC seems to be more evidence that brothers love Joe

Though not nearly as much as they love Hilldawg.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2015, 06:14:56 PM »

Thank you Marist for not including Warren!

Looks like most of her support actually goes to Hillary, big shocker! Not. Hillary isn't in the same position as Romney, with tons of voters looking for an "anti-Hillary" and will move from candidate to candidate in order to find them. This is exactly why Warren was the only one who had a prayer of defeating her. But #keephopealive for Jim Webb guys! LOL

I'm starting to feel bad for Biden. I mean, the sitting VP in third place in NH behind a 73 year old socialist with much lower name recognition? That's rough.

#Lindseymentum confirmed. And you guys doubted me...

Breaking News: IceSpear admits that he believes Elizabeth Warren can defeat Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination in 2016!

Not really breaking, I've always said that. If Warren ran, I'd give Hillary about 90-10 odds. Everyone else has a 0% chance unless she dies. But since Warren is almost certainly not running, that rounds Hillary up to a ~99% chance of being the Democratic nominee.

Breaking News: IceSpear admits he never believed Hillary Clinton's nomination in 2016 was inevitable!
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2015, 07:57:57 PM »

It was be interesting to see the SC numbers without Graham. He could end up being a spoiler if SC becomes 'tie breaker', like Fred Thompson in 08 helped McCain beat Huckabee.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2015, 08:22:06 PM »

If Graham actually runs, and is only polling at ~1% everywhere except his home state, then I can't see his #s in South Carolina actually holding up.  I doubt even 15% of South Carolina Republicans like him enough to throw their vote away on him if it's obvious that he has no support anywhere else.

Of course, if he did somehow win South Carolina, and South Carolina does turn out to be the last state to vote before Super Tuesday, then Super Tuesday will be rather interesting.  I'd expect whoever wins SC to get that last bit of momentum that pushes them into a Super Tuesday victory, but not if it's Graham, who's only doing well in SC because of home state advantage.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2015, 10:08:47 PM »

Graham winning SC would be easy to write off by his opponents and the media likely wouldn't herald it as a game changer. It would be similar to how nobody contested Iowa when Tom Harkin ran in 1992.
Logged
retromike22
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,457
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 17, 2015, 03:00:35 PM »

Graham winning SC would be easy to write off by his opponents and the media likely wouldn't herald it as a game changer. It would be similar to how nobody contested Iowa when Tom Harkin ran in 1992.

It could be like when Gingrich won SC in 2012.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 12 queries.