My point here is not that affirmative consent laws are necessarily bad, but that Klein makes a fundamentally illiberal argument in support of them.
I think I agree with this. Klein's argument is atrocious.
The best defenses of it are (a) it doesn't really change much, since UC and many other universities already use the affirmative consent standard (b) conservatively interpreted, there's nothing unreasonable in the actual
text of SB 967. For example, a lot depends on your interpretation of "affirmative," which is never defined. The rule is appropriately ambiguous. (c) the world is not going to end / a witch hunt is not going to start as the result of this. The media are far more likely to start the latter, but they've burned themselves and people are starting to get wise to them.