Hillary Clinton Used Personal Email at State Dept., Possibly Breaking Rules

[PPT Spiral]

Guccifer was behind the leak.

[King]

Haha great Onion article.

[PresidentTRUMP]

Lol, this is ABSOLUTELY nothing compared to what will be dug up when the Dems anounce Hillary is the candidate...THE CLINTONS HAVE WAYYYY WORS BAGAGE THAN THIS HAHA.

MAYBE SOMEONE CAN ASK HER ABOUT THIS AFTER HER NEXT SPEECH FOR $250k LOL

[bobloblaw]

The interesting thing was the reaction of the NYT readers who posted their opinions. There was no defense of the Clintons like there was in the past. More of a wish for Warren to get in to the race. It may or may not be something important.

[Türkisblau]

Lol, this is ABSOLUTELY nothing compared to what will be dug up when the Dems anounce Hillary is the candidate...THE CLINTONS HAVE WAYYYY WORS BAGAGE THAN THIS HAHA.

MAYBE SOMEONE CAN ASK HER ABOUT THIS AFTER HER NEXT SPEECH FOR $250k LOL

... are you ok?

[IceSpear]

The interesting thing was the reaction of the NYT readers who posted their opinions. There was no defense of the Clintons like there was in the past. More of a wish for Warren to get in to the race. It may or may not be something important.

Are you serious? The NY Times comment section has always hated Hillary and most of them still think Warren is going to run. They're about as representative of the Democratic Party as Daily Kos.

Anyway, if this lame desperate hit piece is the best the NY Times can do in their Sisyphean quest to create a competitive Democratic primary, it seems Hillary doesn't have much to worry about. She used a .com e-mail instead of a .gov e-mail?!?!?!?! WATERGATE REDUX!!! Still, this is why it's better for her to announce sooner rather than later. It's good to have an apparatus in place to respond to crap like this.

[Lief 🗽]

she probably didn't use a government email because she didn't want the nerds at the state department IT department finding her emails with Bill reminiscing about how much fun they had murdering vince foster

[Joe Republic]

These politicians have betrayed the peoples' trust FOR THE LAST TIME

[Likely Voter]

Apparently the rules Hillary violated actually weren't in place until after she left. Also, previous Secretaries of State did the same thing (Kerry is actually first SoS to use .gov address)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/03/hillary-email-scandal-not-so-fast.html

I'm still curious about the security of her private email and how she handled classified stuff, but it may be that there is no scandal here.

[Bakersfield Uber Alles]

Apparently the rules Hillary violated actually weren't in place until after she left. Also, previous Secretaries of State did the same thing (Kerry is actually first SoS to use .gov address)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/03/hillary-email-scandal-not-so-fast.html

I'm still curious about the security of her private email and how she handled classified stuff, but it may be that there is no scandal here.

WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT?!? OF COURSE THIS IS A SCANDAL!!! IT'S BIGGER THAN BENGHAZI-GATE.

I'm sorry. I couldn't help but post a bit of mock outrage. I'm no fan of Hillary, but this just seems like people trying to throw everything at her and hope something sticks.

[The Dowager Mod]

Lol, this is ABSOLUTELY nothing compared to what will be dug up when the Dems anounce Hillary is the candidate...THE CLINTONS HAVE WAYYYY WORS BAGAGE THAN THIS HAHA.

MAYBE SOMEONE CAN ASK HER ABOUT THIS AFTER HER NEXT SPEECH FOR $250k LOL

Hey look! It's "that guy".
I know it's wrong to pick on special needs people so I leave it there.

[IceSpear]

Apparently the rules Hillary violated actually weren't in place until after she left. Also, previous Secretaries of State did the same thing (Kerry is actually first SoS to use .gov address)

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/03/03/hillary-email-scandal-not-so-fast.html

I'm still curious about the security of her private email and how she handled classified stuff, but it may be that there is no scandal here.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Because it's not meant to be factual. It's just a hit piece.

[Landslide Lyndon]

What a ridiculous non-issue. The Times ought to apologize to their readers but I'm not holding my breath.

[Beet]

Disappointed (but not surprised) that the WH is throwing Clinton (and the State Department) under the bus.

[Panda Express]

Just throwing this out there, but Martin O'Malley never used his personal email at the State Dept.

[King]

Just throwing this out there, but Martin O'Malley never used his personal email at the State Dept.

In fact, nobody has ever tried to have a personal conversation with Martin O'Malley.

O'Malley: Leadership You Can Trust

[heatmaster]

Of course there's no scandal there likely voter...didn't you know that? When the Clinton's say what's the fuss about? Then we can rest assured that we can trust them...not easy with there track record!  There was this Democrat troll called Retromike 22 who was sounding off about Jeb Bush not voting In 2008, but no mention of the foreign money donations or the misuse of government emails. You know they are scared witless of Jeb Bush being the nominee in 2016. There's more stuff coming out about Billary's activities, Mark my words. Democrats,  well most of them seem to think it's pretty dandy and are not bothered that there prospective nominee has an ethical deficit;  Joe Biden would be a better bet if I were them.

[HAnnA MArin County]

Disappointed (but not surprised) that the WH is throwing Clinton (and the State Department) under the bus.

Yep, she'll see how the view is under the bus with Reverend Wright, Kathleen Sebelius, Eric Shinseki, and all the other ones. Way to be a TEAM PLAYER, Obama.

[PresidentTRUMP]

Lol, this is ABSOLUTELY nothing compared to what will be dug up when the Dems anounce Hillary is the candidate...THE CLINTONS HAVE WAYYYY WORS BAGAGE THAN THIS HAHA.

MAYBE SOMEONE CAN ASK HER ABOUT THIS AFTER HER NEXT SPEECH FOR $250k LOL

Hey look! It's "that guy".
I know it's wrong to pick on special needs people so I leave it there.

Take the Hilary blinders off buddy, shes Ms. Moneybags, the female version of Mitt Romney.

[heatmaster]

Yes Mrs. Moneybags...foreign money donations being funnelled and laundered through the Clinton Foundation...brings fundraising to a whole new level😲

[seanNJ9]

Yet Democrats will continue to give this woman an open lane to the nomination.

[Blair]

Lol, this is ABSOLUTELY nothing compared to what will be dug up when the Dems anounce Hillary is the candidate...THE CLINTONS HAVE WAYYYY WORS BAGAGE THAN THIS HAHA.

MAYBE SOMEONE CAN ASK HER ABOUT THIS AFTER HER NEXT SPEECH FOR $250k LOL

Hey look! It's "that guy".
I know it's wrong to pick on special needs people so I leave it there.

Take the Hilary blinders off buddy, shes Ms. Moneybags, the female version of Mitt Romney.

But Capitalism is good?

[Brittain33]

I can't wait for Dick Cheney to denounce this.

[heatmaster]

Like the Republicans did with Tom Dewey in 1948,  and we all know how well that went!☺

[Thunderbird is the word]

The interesting thing was the reaction of the NYT readers who posted their opinions. There was no defense of the Clintons like there was in the past. More of a wish for Warren to get in to the race. It may or may not be something important.

Are you serious? The NY Times comment section has always hated Hillary and most of them still think Warren is going to run. They're about as representative of the Democratic Party as Daily Kos.

Actually, speaking as someone who has been reading dailykos since 2005/06 I can say that from what i've noticed the face of it has changed and it's become more Clintonian over the years, and these days is overwhelmingly pro-Hillary with Markos himself endorsing her.