Who would you vote for in this hypothetical election?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 07:18:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Who would you vote for in this hypothetical election?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Poll
Question: For President of the United States in the year 2016
#1
Hillary Clinton (D)
 
#2
Hillary Clinton (R)
 
#3
Hillary Clinton (I/O)
 
#4
Scott Walker (D)
 
#5
Scott Walker (R)
 
#6
Scott Walker (I/O)
 
#7
Bernie Sanders (D)
 
#8
Bernie Sanders (R)
 
#9
Bernie Sanders (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 72

Author Topic: Who would you vote for in this hypothetical election?  (Read 2025 times)
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: March 04, 2015, 02:16:28 AM »

Sanders.

I wish you people would realize that your one vote isn't going to decide the election. You're not going to single handily prevent a Scott Walker presidency by voting for Clinton. That's not how elections work.

Until 500 people out of 6,000,000 in Florida take your mentality and George W Bush is inaugurated.
Logged
Türkisblau
H_Wallace
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,401
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: March 04, 2015, 04:35:35 AM »

Hillary (D)

I think you guys are overestimating the amount of support Sanders would get.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,152
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: March 04, 2015, 05:40:34 AM »

If Sanders runs, I'll stick with him all the way, tactical voting be damned.

The same type of tactic that we criticize our friend TNF for

Yeah, because a two-term US Senator who was reelected with 71% of the vote is totally the same as some random nobody from the Socialist People's Front or whatever.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,309
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: March 04, 2015, 06:19:20 AM »

Whoever the greens nominate
Logged
RFayette
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,959
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: March 04, 2015, 05:16:47 PM »

Walker, one of the few Republicans I would vote for. Cheesy
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: March 04, 2015, 05:19:03 PM »

Walker, maybe.
Logged
DC Al Fine
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,085
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: March 04, 2015, 10:08:10 PM »

But a scenario like this would almost definitely result in a President Walker, because Sanders would get a good share of Liberals and Dem-leaning Indies.

Not necessarily. Hillary could definitely still win even if he pulled a 2000 Nader-esque performance.

The problem is that Sanders could pull off something between an Anderson and Perot performance... and his electorate would lean much more heavily Dem than Perot or Anderson's.
Logged
Brewer
BrewerPaul
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,622


Political Matrix
E: -6.90, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: March 05, 2015, 12:58:06 AM »

Hillary without a shred of doubt.
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,325
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: March 05, 2015, 12:58:57 AM »

Hillary without a shred of doubt.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: March 05, 2015, 03:18:24 AM »

Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: March 05, 2015, 04:23:28 AM »

But a scenario like this would almost definitely result in a President Walker, because Sanders would get a good share of Liberals and Dem-leaning Indies.

Not necessarily. Hillary could definitely still win even if he pulled a 2000 Nader-esque performance.

The problem is that Sanders could pull off something between an Anderson and Perot performance... and his electorate would lean much more heavily Dem than Perot or Anderson's.

I highly doubt that. Even Nader 2000 is a stretch considering how much more popular Hillary is among the base than Gore was.
Logged
LeBron
LeBron FitzGerald
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,906
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: March 06, 2015, 06:53:04 PM »

Hillary (D). She's not my preferred Democratic nominee (I like Biden more), but a Sanders Independent candidacy is pretty much giving the middle finger to the establishment so forget him.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,687
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: March 07, 2015, 02:26:15 PM »

Clinton. the world can't afford a climate denier in the White House.
Which candidate doesn't believe in climate?
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,449
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: March 07, 2015, 03:33:37 PM »

Hillary.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 13 queries.