NE1: Haverford Act-Amendment to Pornography and Age of Consent Act 2010 (Voting) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 01:41:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  NE1: Haverford Act-Amendment to Pornography and Age of Consent Act 2010 (Voting) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NE1: Haverford Act-Amendment to Pornography and Age of Consent Act 2010 (Voting)  (Read 1728 times)
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« on: March 04, 2015, 10:16:58 AM »
I think a two year gap if under sixteen. So: If 14 up to 16 and if 15 up to 17.

It's difficult to say what would be best though. I just feel that two years would be better.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: March 05, 2015, 07:40:19 AM »
Could we move the age of consent to sixteen then - without allowing under 16s in any circumstance to have sex (if we're worried about child paedophilia)?
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: March 05, 2015, 12:49:50 PM »
Nay. If it was the same, but 16, I would vote aye.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: March 05, 2015, 04:00:29 PM »
Quote from: Sawx, King in the North on March 05, 2015, 03:09:35 PM
Quote from: Clyde1998 on March 05, 2015, 07:40:19 AM
Could we move the age of consent to sixteen then - without allowing under 16s in any circumstance to have sex (if we're worried about child paedophilia)?

I would veto that if it hits my desk. People under 14 shouldn't be having sex, but if you're 15 and you're, say, dating someone a year above you, you're able to consent.
Fair enough - so 15 absolute minimum:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2015, 11:59:18 AM »
What about this?

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: March 08, 2015, 11:53:42 AM »
I didn't even see that we were supposed to vote on it - whoops...
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: March 08, 2015, 04:35:06 PM »
Quote from: Speaker Blair on March 08, 2015, 01:10:50 PM
Quote from: Clyde1998 on March 08, 2015, 11:53:42 AM
I didn't even see that we were supposed to vote on it - whoops...

Haha you voted against though
Haha - must have completely blanked that out. Cheesy
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: March 08, 2015, 06:14:08 PM »
I'd agree with that.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2015, 03:37:38 PM »
Aye.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2015, 02:19:34 PM »
Has this bill been passed or has it been vetoed?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 13 queries.