Rasmussen polls Clinton-less race: Warren 31% Biden 30% Sanders 7% Webb 6%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 11:49:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  Rasmussen polls Clinton-less race: Warren 31% Biden 30% Sanders 7% Webb 6%
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Rasmussen polls Clinton-less race: Warren 31% Biden 30% Sanders 7% Webb 6%  (Read 724 times)
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 10, 2015, 06:08:03 PM »

Rasmussen polls the Democratic primary race (nationally) without Clinton:

link

Warren 31%
Biden 30%
Sanders 7%
Webb 6%
O'Malley 2%
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2015, 06:36:21 PM »

Really Ras? Isn't it a little late for this? This might have been relevant like a year ago.

The fact that there's more polls excluding Hillary (who is nearly certain to run) than those that exclude Warren (who is extremely unlikely to run) is nothing short of ridiculous.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,042
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2015, 02:31:29 AM »

Clinton drops out and O'Malley's support doubles!  Called it.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2015, 07:21:56 PM »

Really Ras? Isn't it a little late for this? This might have been relevant like a year ago.

The fact that there's more polls excluding Hillary (who is nearly certain to run) than those that exclude Warren (who is extremely unlikely to run) is nothing short of ridiculous.

Who cares? The more information we get, the better.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2015, 11:27:39 PM »

Really Ras? Isn't it a little late for this? This might have been relevant like a year ago.

The fact that there's more polls excluding Hillary (who is nearly certain to run) than those that exclude Warren (who is extremely unlikely to run) is nothing short of ridiculous.

Who cares? The more information we get, the better.

It's redundant. It's fun in a curiosity sense, but it has no real world application. It would be like polling the Republican primary without Jeb.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 19, 2015, 07:32:39 PM »

Really Ras? Isn't it a little late for this? This might have been relevant like a year ago.

The fact that there's more polls excluding Hillary (who is nearly certain to run) than those that exclude Warren (who is extremely unlikely to run) is nothing short of ridiculous.

Who cares? The more information we get, the better.

It's redundant. It's fun in a curiosity sense, but it has no real world application. It would be like polling the Republican primary without Jeb.

Well, what if Clinton croaks or faces a serious health problem in the next year that prevents her from running? It's not likely but it's not an impossibility either. She's almost 70.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,174
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2015, 07:40:19 PM »

"Blacks are much stronger supporters of Biden than whites and other minority voters are."

Is that just the Obama legacy factor?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 19, 2015, 10:04:03 PM »

Really Ras? Isn't it a little late for this? This might have been relevant like a year ago.

The fact that there's more polls excluding Hillary (who is nearly certain to run) than those that exclude Warren (who is extremely unlikely to run) is nothing short of ridiculous.

Who cares? The more information we get, the better.

It's redundant. It's fun in a curiosity sense, but it has no real world application. It would be like polling the Republican primary without Jeb.

Well, what if Clinton croaks or faces a serious health problem in the next year that prevents her from running? It's not likely but it's not an impossibility either. She's almost 70.

Fair enough. But if that happened, the race would become quite scrambled. Would it really end up becoming Warren vs. Biden? There's so many other candidates that could potentially jump in. And nobody really knows whether Warren genuinely has no interest in running under any circumstances, or just doesn't want to run against Hillary.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.035 seconds with 13 queries.