Will MI correct the Electoral College bias towards Democrats?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:25:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Will MI correct the Electoral College bias towards Democrats?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Author Topic: Will MI correct the Electoral College bias towards Democrats?  (Read 3472 times)
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: March 21, 2015, 05:28:39 PM »

I agree with pbrower! Good for Governor Snyder for blocking these bills, and for confirming my decision to vote for him was the right one! If Far right Republicans cannot win in a general election without changing the rules to benefit them (like doing away with the congressional redistricting commission in Arizona), then they will lose support over time and be known as the  Corruption Party.
The Commissions Map was unfairly tilted towards Dems you have to admit that though. I  was not for bringing a case to court of the commission itself though.
Logged
hopper
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,414
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: March 21, 2015, 05:35:27 PM »

Haha at Democrats panicking because they may lose EVs

Haha at Republicans panicking because they can't win a state fairly.

Because of ing Detroit tilting the whole state that would otherwise be a likely Republican state

Wrong. Michigan has given a plurality of votes to Democrats in each Presidential election beginning in 1992. Any scheme that would have given the majority of electoral votes in Michigan to the Republican Party in any subsequent election would be a gross distortion of the vote of Michiganders.

The split of congressional districts in Michigan (see also Ohio and Pennsylvania) is so designed that Democrats would need an effective majority of 55-45 or so for Democrats in the net vote for Congressional seats to break even in Congressional representation. Republican-designed reapportionment of districts has ensured that a small number of seats are easy wins for Democrats but all other districts have a clear built-in advantage for Republicans.

The worst possible result (short of a partisan governor deciding the electoral results on his whim) would be that districts allocate votes as they vote ion the Presidential race and that the winner of the majority of such districts gets the two other votes.

By the way -- why does a (presumably black and poor) vote in Detroit have less value than the vote of some rich farmer or executive? The vote is the only participation that anyone surely has irrespective of his economic plight. Government is responsible to the por as well as the rich lest one have a plutocratic oligarchy.

But keep pushing the agenda of the Koch syndicate and its legislative arm ALEC upon us all and your satisfaction at us liberals moaning and gnashing our teeth will soon be your nightmare, too. If black voters are the difference between democracy and fascism, then all hail the votes of black people who can keep American politics more moral than is the usual case of a plutocratic oligarchy.    

 
You guys have Soros and Steyer though. They push some of your agenda(maybe not all of it though.)

I do agree with you on "one person" "one vote" though.

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 12 queries.