Agricultural Policy Act of 2015 (Final vote) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:15:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Agricultural Policy Act of 2015 (Final vote) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Agricultural Policy Act of 2015 (Final vote)  (Read 3302 times)
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« on: March 19, 2015, 09:37:23 AM »

Certainly nothing Maoist about giving farmers the right to collectively bargain and distribute their produce for a fair price.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2015, 10:21:58 AM »

I object to the proposed amendment.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2015, 06:05:15 AM »

I'm not a big fan of section 2 either; I feel like it could put so called working farmers at a competitive disadvantage and ultimately pull many of them out of business.

How would giving farmers the right to form unions put them at a disadvantage?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2015, 08:56:01 AM »

I'm not a big fan of section 2 either; I feel like it could put so called working farmers at a competitive disadvantage and ultimately pull many of them out of business.

How would giving farmers the right to form unions put them at a disadvantage?

Don't you think the food distributors would then be far more likely to seek business from the major farms   (i.e. those with farmhands and with many paid workers)?

That said, giving them the right to bargain is a different thing than forcing them to join a union, so that's why I haven't proposed an amendment to remove that section.

I'm okay with adjusting the nature of that section if need be. The idea was to give collective bargaining rights specifically to those who don't employ others, which would be keeping in line with our general idea of collective bargaining as being a process for workers. Farmers who don't employ anyone else have more in common with workers than do big time farmers who employ a lot of farmhands, who are closer to capitalists by nature.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2015, 08:07:32 AM »

Amendment is unfriendly
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2015, 06:36:45 AM »

Nay
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2015, 11:55:19 AM »

Amendment is friendly.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2015, 06:28:26 AM »

Could we not just discuss proposals for modifying this out in the open?
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2015, 09:03:14 AM »

If you're feeling a bit lost, I'd encourage you to re-read the thread.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2015, 08:44:58 AM »

Amendment is friendly.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2015, 07:05:08 PM »

I motion for a final vote.
Logged
TNF
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,440


« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2015, 11:13:37 AM »

Aye
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 12 queries.