UT-Dan Jones and Associates: Jeb up 7
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:37:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  UT-Dan Jones and Associates: Jeb up 7
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UT-Dan Jones and Associates: Jeb up 7  (Read 710 times)
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 20, 2015, 11:55:11 PM »

http://utahpolicy.com/index.php/features/today-at-utah-policy/5104-bush-clinton-are-frontrunners-for-2016-nomination-among-utahns

Bush 21
Walker 14
Paul 10

Clinton 56
Warren 25
Biden 4

Somewhat surprising that Jeb is ahead here. No idea why they included Warren, yet not any of the three candidates who are actually likely to run.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2015, 12:00:24 AM »

Let's chop off 5% from Clinton to account for Webb, O'Malley, and Sanders:

Clinton 51
Warren 25
Biden 4
Webb 2
O'Malley 2
Sanders 1

#Clintonatonly51%
#Warrennearing30%
#2008Redux!!!!
Logged
solarstorm
solarstorm2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,637
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2015, 04:11:14 PM »

It's interesting that Atlas predicted Utah wrong...

Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,941


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2015, 04:15:52 PM »

#mormonshatehillary
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2015, 04:42:40 PM »

A lot of the Utah Dems are relatively progressive, so it makes sense that they'd prefer Warren.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2015, 05:12:25 AM »

The actual interesting thing in the Dem numbers isn't Hillary's microscopic 31 point lead over a non candidate, but the fact that the sitting VP got 4%. Some of the numbers Biden's been putting up in these polls have been jaw droppingly awful. If I were him, I'd declare I wasn't running ASAP so they stop including my name and causing me embarrassment.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2015, 07:52:51 AM »

You guys realize that the overall sample for this poll was just 400 people ?

So, the Democratic sub-sample is like what ? 100 people ?
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2015, 12:48:23 PM »

The actual interesting thing in the Dem numbers isn't Hillary's microscopic 31 point lead over a non candidate, but the fact that the sitting VP got 4%. Some of the numbers Biden's been putting up in these polls have been jaw droppingly awful. If I were him, I'd declare I wasn't running ASAP so they stop including my name and causing me embarrassment.

The media doesn't listen to Warren when she denies interest in running, so why would they listen to Biden?
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2015, 01:38:58 PM »

The actual interesting thing in the Dem numbers isn't Hillary's microscopic 31 point lead over a non candidate, but the fact that the sitting VP got 4%. Some of the numbers Biden's been putting up in these polls have been jaw droppingly awful. If I were him, I'd declare I wasn't running ASAP so they stop including my name and causing me embarrassment.

The media doesn't listen to Warren when she denies interest in running, so why would they listen to Biden?

Touche.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,785


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2015, 05:25:44 PM »

Bush does seem like a good candidate for Mormons to support.
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2015, 06:39:05 PM »

#Warren25??
#2008REDUX!!!!!!
#HillaryNotInevitable
#Ready4Warren
#DemsNeedAnAlternative
#IfHillaryLosesUtahSheLosesTheElection!!!!

Can you please stop?

OT: I'm surprised Rand Paul isn't doing better.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 13 queries.