Hillary as an Independent in 2008?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 04:02:31 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  Past Election What-ifs (US) (Moderator: Dereich)
  Hillary as an Independent in 2008?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Hillary as an Independent in 2008?  (Read 3534 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,913


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 21, 2015, 05:28:05 PM »

What would the map have looked like if, instead of dropping out on June 4, 2008, Hillary aggressively pursued her rights all the way to the Democratic convention in late August? Let's say she is narrowly defeated for the nomination by super-delegates in an extremely polarizing process, with accusations of racism and sexism flying everywhere, then asks her people to withdraw from the convention and announces her run as an independent. What would the map look like then?
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2015, 05:36:00 PM »

Only NC would flip to McCain in that scenario, nothing else would change. Hillary would look like a sore, egocentric loser who only cares about herself and not the American people and it would destroy a potential 2016 run.
Uh, this is Hillary Clinton, not Carol Mosley Braun. The map would be very, very blue.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,913


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2015, 05:39:03 PM »

I think she would have been able to pull 20% of Obama's ultimate voters over to her.

Logged
solarstorm
solarstorm2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,637
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2015, 06:35:13 PM »

I think she would have won Arkansas.
It is also easily conceivable that some paradoxes could have occurred; Hillary could have attracted many one-time Republicans that only voted for McCain in fierce opposition to Obama.
States like West Virginia, Kentucky or Louisiana going for Obama would have been unintentionally hilarious. Tongue
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2015, 06:51:11 PM »

McCain wins easily.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2015, 08:34:55 PM »

Hillary probably snags 5-10% of the vote, severely damaging but not destroying Obama's chances. Although most of it would have come from Obama, she could've taken away a bit from McCain as well, particularly in Appalachia. My guess of a map:



McCain - 275
Obama - 263
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2015, 10:19:16 PM »

In this case, Hillary is a stronger (and multi focused) Ross Perot, meaning a true three-way race.

Obama wins by a similar electoral vote margin, but a much smaller popular vote margin. Given the economic collapse, Hillary might beat out McCain for second in the popular vote, and win states like Missouri and Indiana.
Logged
Indy Texas
independentTX
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,272
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: -3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2015, 01:09:43 AM »

There are a lot of states where it would be too late for her to get a spot on the ballot as an independent to begin with if she decided to do this following the August DNC.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2015, 02:17:11 AM »

There are a lot of states where it would be too late for her to get a spot on the ballot as an independent to begin with if she decided to do this following the August DNC.

The last primary is in June. The DNC is in August... She would've skipped the DNC altogether.
Logged
Jerseyrules
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,544
United States


Political Matrix
E: 10.00, S: -4.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2015, 03:59:27 PM »

In this case, Hillary is a stronger (and multi focused) Ross Perot, meaning a true three-way race.

Obama wins by a similar electoral vote margin, but a much smaller popular vote margin. Given the economic collapse, Hillary might beat out McCain for second in the popular vote, and win states like Missouri and Indiana.

lolno

Hillary might hit the 20% mark, would almost undoubtedly qualify for the Presidential debates, etc. but no way she dips into McCain's votes more than Obama's.  McCain wins at least 300 EV's and probably wins high 30's or low 40's in PV
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,073
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 05, 2015, 12:35:48 PM »

The self-destructive dysfunction in the Democratic Party needed to cause this is borderline impossible after the 2006 elections.
Logged
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 05, 2015, 12:50:43 PM »

The self-destructive dysfunction in the Democratic Party needed to cause this is borderline impossible after the 2006 elections.

My words. Why does everyone think Dems would have allowed such a split to elect McCain?

This is Hillary Clinton we're talking about....when has she ever cared what anyone (except herself) thinks?
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,073
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 05, 2015, 01:02:08 PM »

The self-destructive dysfunction in the Democratic Party needed to cause this is borderline impossible after the 2006 elections.

My words. Why does everyone think Dems would have allowed such a split to elect McCain?

This is Hillary Clinton we're talking about....when has she ever cared what anyone (except herself) thinks?

This does nothing to help her career, though. In fact, the backlash will be so severe and so fast she'll be wishing she was post-2000 Ralph Nader by the end.
Logged
RosettaStoned
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,154
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.45, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 06, 2015, 09:51:21 PM »


  Hilldawg would have won California.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2015, 03:13:22 PM »

Hillary would have gotten more than ten percent of the vote, enough to make McCain President.

A plausible map...


McCain/ Palin- 316 Electoral Votes, 43%
Obama/ Pelosi- 222 Electoral Votes, 38%
Hillary Clinton/ Ed Rendell- 0 Electoral Votes, 18%

The recrimations would be interesting. Obviously, many members of the party would be upset at her, but they're also out of the White House if she does the same thing in 2012.

Running mates would be an interesting question. Obama might try to turn out the base more.
Logged
Agonized-Statism
Anarcho-Statism
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,816


Political Matrix
E: -9.10, S: -5.83

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2023, 01:32:40 AM »
« Edited: June 11, 2023, 01:36:08 AM by Narco-Statism »


Senator John McCain (R-AZ) / Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) ✓
Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) / Senator Joe Biden (D-DE)
Senator Hillary Clinton (PUMA-NY) / Governor Ed Rendell (PUMA-PA)

President McCain then screws up so bad that Democrats rally behind someone in 2012 or Clinton's vanity project ends up outdoing the Republicans for that election at least.
Logged
Ragnaroni
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.97, S: 1.74

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2023, 09:01:39 AM »


Senator John McCain (R-AZ) / Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) ✓
Senator Barack Obama (D-IL) / Senator Joe Biden (D-DE)
Senator Hillary Clinton (PUMA-NY) / Governor Ed Rendell (PUMA-PA)

President McCain then screws up so bad that Democrats rally behind someone in 2012 or Clinton's vanity project ends up outdoing the Republicans for that election at least.
The last post here was from 2015, that was 8 years ago....
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 13 queries.