Clinton vs Paul
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 01:18:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Clinton vs Paul		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Clinton vs Paul  (Read 3626 times)
#discipleofJesus
Newbie
*
Posts: 5
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 22, 2015, 10:29:25 AM »
In this very likely scenario, who would pull it off?
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2015, 10:36:12 AM »
Best case scenario

Logged
#discipleofJesus
Newbie
*
Posts: 5
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2015, 10:38:35 AM »
Best thing would be Hilary not running at all....
Logged
solarstorm
solarstorm2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,637
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM »
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,283
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2015, 03:53:24 PM »
Quote from: Landroo Lover on March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...

Yes, I know it is gonna be a very difficult state to win because NH women just LOVE Hillary. Maybe he can win enough men, but I doubt it. The GOP doesn't need NH (New Hawaii) anyway, so..
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2015, 04:16:33 PM »
Quote from: DeadPrez on March 22, 2015, 12:52:26 PM


Quote from: #discipleofJesus on March 22, 2015, 10:38:35 AM
Best thing would be Hilary not running at all....

I honestly think Paul would squash Hilary or force her to come off as being antiwar and pro-civil liberties. If she turns her back on these issues, she will lose re-election in 2012.

If he wins NH he wins Colorado
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2015, 04:18:31 PM »
Quote from: Landroo Lover on March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...

Oh yes, because the leading state in the Libertarian movement wouldn't even think about voting for the new leader of the Libertarian wing of the GOP. Don't believe that one poll where he was leading Hillary there, guys!
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2015, 04:31:08 PM »
I don't see Paul winning OH and FL so easily.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2015, 04:47:19 PM »
Quote from: IndyRep on March 22, 2015, 04:29:37 PM
Quote from: Free Bird on March 22, 2015, 04:18:31 PM
Quote from: Landroo Lover on March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...

Oh yes, because the leading state in the Libertarian movement wouldn't even think about voting for the new leader of the Libertarian wing of the GOP. Don't believe that one poll where he was leading Hillary there, guys!

You mean Colorado or NH? Anyway, Paul has a great chance of winning CO. NH is more difficult, though he may be the best GOPer for the state.

New Hampshire to counter Landroo's little tantrum
Logged
RR1997
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,997
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2015, 08:43:14 AM »
Clinton would obviously win.

I still believe that Paul would do better than the other GOP candidates, but that is not saying much.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 24, 2015, 12:41:22 PM »
Quote from: Free Bird on March 22, 2015, 04:18:31 PM
Quote from: Landroo Lover on March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...

Oh yes, because the leading state in the Libertarian movement wouldn't even think about voting for the new leader of the Libertarian wing of the GOP. Don't believe that one poll where he was leading Hillary there, guys!

What percentage of the vote do you think that the Free State Movement has a hold on?
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 24, 2015, 12:41:54 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Illini on March 24, 2015, 12:41:22 PM
Quote from: Free Bird on March 22, 2015, 04:18:31 PM
Quote from: Landroo Lover on March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...

Oh yes, because the leading state in the Libertarian movement wouldn't even think about voting for the new leader of the Libertarian wing of the GOP. Don't believe that one poll where he was leading Hillary there, guys!

What percentage of the vote do you think that the Free State Movement has a hold on?

The populous there in general has a libertarian stint to it.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2015, 12:43:03 PM »
Quote from: DeadPrez on March 24, 2015, 12:24:32 AM
George Bush won New Hampshire, but leftists think Paul can't.....

Yeah 10 years ago.

This works with 2013 Paul-before he started selling out
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,776


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 24, 2015, 12:53:13 PM »
Something like this:
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,636
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 24, 2015, 12:54:58 PM »
Quote from: DeadPrez on March 24, 2015, 12:24:32 AM
George Bush won New Hampshire, but leftists think Paul can't.....

Bush won with 48%. With Nader off the ballot, Bush probably would have lost.
Logged
Mr. Illini
liberty142
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,847
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.26, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 24, 2015, 01:01:32 PM »
Quote from: Free Bird on March 24, 2015, 12:41:54 PM
Quote from: Mr. Illini on March 24, 2015, 12:41:22 PM
Quote from: Free Bird on March 22, 2015, 04:18:31 PM
Quote from: Landroo Lover on March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...

Oh yes, because the leading state in the Libertarian movement wouldn't even think about voting for the new leader of the Libertarian wing of the GOP. Don't believe that one poll where he was leading Hillary there, guys!

What percentage of the vote do you think that the Free State Movement has a hold on?

The populous there in general has a libertarian stint to it.

That doesn't mean they'll just fall in line for anyone who appears to have libertarian leanings, it just means that Paul would do marginally better than other Republicans.

Ron Paul, libertarian hero, didn't even win the Republican primary there.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 24, 2015, 01:39:14 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Illini on March 24, 2015, 01:01:32 PM
Quote from: Free Bird on March 24, 2015, 12:41:54 PM
Quote from: Mr. Illini on March 24, 2015, 12:41:22 PM
Quote from: Free Bird on March 22, 2015, 04:18:31 PM
Quote from: Landroo Lover on March 22, 2015, 01:34:37 PM
Could every Republican/Libertarian stop pretending, please, that Paul would have the slightest chance in New Hampshire? Sheezus man...

Oh yes, because the leading state in the Libertarian movement wouldn't even think about voting for the new leader of the Libertarian wing of the GOP. Don't believe that one poll where he was leading Hillary there, guys!

What percentage of the vote do you think that the Free State Movement has a hold on?

The populous there in general has a libertarian stint to it.

That doesn't mean they'll just fall in line for anyone who appears to have libertarian leanings, it just means that Paul would do marginally better than other Republicans.

Ron Paul, libertarian hero, didn't even win the Republican primary there.

Because it was a closed primary with a native son on the ballot. And Paul pulled a damn good second with that
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,636
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 24, 2015, 01:40:11 PM »
Besides being anti-tax, what other Libertarian positions are popular in NH?
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 24, 2015, 01:51:09 PM »
Quote from: ShadowOfTheWave on March 24, 2015, 01:40:11 PM
Besides being anti-tax, what other Libertarian positions are popular in NH?

Eminent domain reform, no automatic police checks, right to revolution, car insurance is optional, no mandatory seat belt or helmet laws, among others
Logged
Atlas Has Shrugged
ChairmanSanchez
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,096
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.29, S: -5.04


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 24, 2015, 01:53:02 PM »
I'd give Paul NC, but otherwise, this is pretty much what I see as of right now.
Logged
Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort
Joshua
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,710
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -5.91

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 24, 2015, 02:04:27 PM »

Am I sniffing home state bias?

And Ohio and Nevada are Hillary country against Paul.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.046 seconds with 13 queries.