MT-Gravis: Clinton very weak, 3-way tie in GOP primary

[Tender Branson]

Dems:

42% Clinton
34% Warren
  6% Biden
  3% Webb
  2% Warner
  1% O'Malley
12% Unsure

GOP:

20% Bush
19% Huckabee
19% Walker
  9% Rubio
  5% Christie
  4% Cruz
  4% Paul
  3% Perry
  2% Carson
16% Unsure

http://gravismarketing.com/polling-and-market-research/current-montana-polling-2/

[King]

Montana is Warren country? Thanks Gravis.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

This is the definition of email gate fallout. Hillary is looking less inevitable every day.

[Tender Branson]

This is the definition of email gate fallout. Hillary is looking less inevitable every day.

This poll was done before emailgate though. It's already really old.

But it might indicate that Hillary has a structural problem in MT.

After all, Obama kicked her ass in 2008 in MT.

[Oak Hills]

This is the definition of email gate fallout. Hillary is looking less inevitable every day.

I have to say, her numbers are really dropping fast. I wonder why? I mean, it's happening fast and in every state. Is E-Mailgate really the reason?

I don't know about the other states, but in this case I think we can attribute it to the fact that this is >Gravis.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Hopefully Warren either runs or campaigns for Biden.

[Phony Moderate]

Montana, of course, is always critical in deciding party nominations.

[IceSpear]

LOL at you all believing Gravis. The desperation is palpable.

[solarstorm]

A Montana poll excluding Schweitzer cannot be taken seriously!

[solarstorm]

This poll was done before emailgate though. It's already really old.

But it might indicate that Hillary has a structural problem in MT.

After all, Obama kicked her ass in 2008 in MT.

56-41 is an easy victory, but it's not not what I'd call *ss-k*cking.

[solarstorm]

What happened to Cruz anyway?
He used to be leading in Montana for such a long time, and he's only at 4%.
And Paul's low number in that libertarian state is pretty surprising, too

[Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort]

I don't understand Montana, but I guess I can see why Hillary is weaker.

It is default Republican, but has been electing a lot of non-DINO Democrats, often because of large libertarian showings. So I'm assuming Montana Dems are too populist for Hillary.

[Warren 4 Secretary of Everything]

This poll also has Bullock, the most popular elected official in the state sans Schweitzer, as at best tied for reelection.

[Ebsy]

What I find most striking about Montana is that according to Gallup, 21.1% of the electorate there identifies as liberal, much more than it's conservative neighbors, and also only .4% less than Wisconsin and more than Ohio or New Hampshire. Perhaps that is why Hillary does so poorly among Montana Democrats: the Democratic Party in the state is more proportionally liberal than state parties in Iowa or New Hampshire.