Iowa without "first-caucus-state" status
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:28:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Iowa without "first-caucus-state" status
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you think Iowa would have voted differently if it were late-primary state?
#1
Yes, it would be as Republican as ND/SD/NE.
#2
Yes, it would vote Republican more often.
#3
No.
#4
Yes, it would vote Democratic more often.
#5
Yes, it would be as Democratic as MN/WI/IL
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Iowa without "first-caucus-state" status  (Read 648 times)
solarstorm
solarstorm2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,637
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 26, 2015, 05:11:03 PM »

Do you think Iowa would voted differently if it were late-primary state?
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 26, 2015, 06:00:50 PM »

I don't see how the primary timing would effect general elections.
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,636
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 26, 2015, 06:04:51 PM »

I don't see how the primary timing would effect general elections.
The one thing I can see is that parties give more attention to the early states (e.g. NH/IA), so whoever does well there can set up a lot of infrastructure in the state.

Although, South Carolina isn't competitive.....
Logged
solarstorm
solarstorm2012
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,637
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 26, 2015, 06:15:14 PM »

I don't see how the primary timing would effect general elections.

All the candidates had been campaigning throughout Iowa, they spent reams of money, they promoted their party, the media provided the US with coverage of that state, and so on.
No states are canvassed more thoroughly for votes than Iowa and New Hampshire.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 26, 2015, 06:44:57 PM »
« Edited: March 26, 2015, 06:49:18 PM by Governor TDAS04 »

I don't think its voting patterns would be very different.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2015, 07:11:40 PM »

Maybe slightly more Republican. Iowa is on the border between the Democratic friendly Midwest and the solidly Republican plains, so it's not too much of an aberration for it to be a swing state.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 27, 2015, 10:08:15 PM »

Most importantly we wouldnt have to put ethanol in our cars
Logged
andrew_c
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 454
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 27, 2015, 11:56:51 PM »

It's the demographics and geography of Iowa that make it a swing state, not the timing of primary elections.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.