UK General Election - May 7th 2015 (The Official Campaign Thread)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:17:24 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK General Election - May 7th 2015 (The Official Campaign Thread)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 46
Author Topic: UK General Election - May 7th 2015 (The Official Campaign Thread)  (Read 161123 times)
Gary J
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 286
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #200 on: April 07, 2015, 10:30:58 AM »

Surely another hung parliament must mean the end of FPTP?

Not necessarily. The Conservative and Labour parties both have a very strong self interest in preserving FPTP. Presumably any proportional system would accelerate the decline (and possible fragmentation) of the two largest parties.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #201 on: April 07, 2015, 10:34:26 AM »

We have a new Populus: Labour 33, Con 31, UKIP 15, LDem 10, Greens 4
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #202 on: April 07, 2015, 10:35:30 AM »

In Canadian terms, what the LibDems had built them selves up to by 2010 roughly parallels what the Canadian Liberals had been reduced to by 2011: campus towns a la Guelph/Kingston and the Maritimey "Celtic fringe"...

Broadly speaking, yes. And aren't a load of people on Newfies even descended from West Country families?
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #203 on: April 07, 2015, 10:38:18 AM »

YouGov's website contains a live (unweighted) poll.

Today Tony Blair is publicly endorsing Ed Miliband. Do you think this will help or hinder the Labour party’s election campaign?

After 10,222 votes:
Help - 15%
Hinder - 50%
Neither - 24%
Don't Know - 11%

The weighted poll goes live at 6pm - so it'll be interesting to see what Labour voters think about this...
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #204 on: April 07, 2015, 10:44:13 AM »

Actually, class-based voting was never as prevalent in Britain as one might have expected in such a society (though I guess there were significant regional variations). It never reached the same extent as class-based voting in the Scandinavian countries during the 50s and 60s, for instance (according to Stein Rokkan, who specialised in comparative politics). I don't remember the reasons for this, though.

Well, yes, in the 50s you had (lets use the classic examples) some solidly proletarian Liverpool seats with Conservative MPs while Labour held a bunch of not-particularly-gritty seats based on large market towns. Class has been the main thing since the 20s, but it has always applied itself in complex ways. Part of the issue was (is) that class in Britain arguably has less in common with the classical sociological understandings of it than it does with caste.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #205 on: April 07, 2015, 11:43:58 AM »

It's a stupid question re Blair. Of course most people will 'think' its a bad thing because most people 'think' TB is unpopular when in fact he's a good opposite of Miliband. I know Blair is a warmongering tory according to most labourites but he's still a voice of reason on the EU
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #206 on: April 07, 2015, 12:02:50 PM »

Do I smell an oh-so-slight increase of voting intention for the LibDems in the last few polls ? They've hit double digits in a few of the latest ones, a thing they hadn't done for a number of weeks, to my knowledge. Is that so ?
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #207 on: April 07, 2015, 12:18:46 PM »

Yes, they do seem to be up very very slightly, at least for the moment. Of course even 10% represents a loss of a majority (!) of their votes from 2010.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #208 on: April 07, 2015, 12:37:55 PM »

Not worth much, but the YouGov Scottish internals show a huge gender gap - SNP ahead 52-24 amongst men, 40-34 amongst women.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #209 on: April 07, 2015, 12:42:22 PM »

A peculiarity of YouGov's methodology is that while they're probably one of the more reliable polling companies (though is this really saying a lot he mutters darkly), their internals are best left well alone.

Anyway, a blank Scottish map will be out by the end of the week.
Logged
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,068


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #210 on: April 07, 2015, 12:43:56 PM »

In Canadian terms, what the LibDems had built them selves up to by 2010 roughly parallels what the Canadian Liberals had been reduced to by 2011: campus towns a la Guelph/Kingston and the Maritimey "Celtic fringe"...

That's a very apt comparison.
Logged
King of Kensington
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,068


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #211 on: April 07, 2015, 12:46:11 PM »

Broadly speaking, yes. And aren't a load of people on Newfies even descended from West Country families?

Yes, the vast majority of Newfoundland's population is made up of West Country English stock in the rural areas and Irish Catholic in St. John's and the Avalon Peninsula (aka the Irish Shore).
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #212 on: April 07, 2015, 12:48:01 PM »

Surely another hung parliament must mean the end of FPTP?

Actual quote from someone way more right-on and constitutionally 'progressive' than me at the time of the AV referendum: 'you know, I rather like dear old First Past The Post.'
Logged
afleitch
Moderator
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,855


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #213 on: April 07, 2015, 12:53:21 PM »

So today's battleground is Europe. And Labour brought it up. Strange times.
Logged
Silent Hunter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,320
United Kingdom


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #214 on: April 07, 2015, 02:19:34 PM »

It's a stupid question re Blair. Of course most people will 'think' its a bad thing because most people 'think' TB is unpopular when in fact he's a good opposite of Miliband. I know Blair is a warmongering tory according to most labourites but he's still a voice of reason on the EU

Nearly all of the people who won't vote Labour because Tony Blair turned up weren't voting Labour anyway. That ship not only sailed, its been scrapped under the SDSR.

(It was estimated in 2005 that Iraq cost Labour 3% and 3% only)
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #215 on: April 07, 2015, 02:22:43 PM »

I'm listening to the STV debate between the Scottish leaders - Ruth Davidson (Conservative) has said that the Conservatives would attempt to form a majority government if they're the largest party.

Meanwhile, Jim Murphy (Labour) has said that "David Cameron ain't no Lionel Messi"...
Logged
You kip if you want to...
change08
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,940
United Kingdom
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #216 on: April 07, 2015, 04:32:12 PM »

I'm listening to the STV debate between the Scottish leaders - Ruth Davidson (Conservative) has said that the Conservatives would attempt to form a majority government if they're the largest party.

Meanwhile, Jim Murphy (Labour) has said that "David Cameron ain't no Lionel Messi"...

I didn't watch, but I'm seeing that Sturgeon went full Marois on the neverendum question...
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #217 on: April 07, 2015, 04:35:36 PM »

YouGov: Lab 35, Con 33, UKIP 14, Lib Dems 8, Greens 5
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #218 on: April 07, 2015, 04:39:46 PM »

I'm listening to the STV debate between the Scottish leaders - Ruth Davidson (Conservative) has said that the Conservatives would attempt to form a majority government if they're the largest party.

Meanwhile, Jim Murphy (Labour) has said that "David Cameron ain't no Lionel Messi"...

I didn't watch, but I'm seeing that Sturgeon went full Marois on the neverendum question...
She said that she wouldn't rule out another referendum after the 2016 Scottish election, but she didn't say if it would definitely be in or not in the 2016 SNP manifesto.

It's not certain that it will be in it under any terms, but it could be in the manifesto under certain terms (such as Scotland voting to stay in the EU, but the UK leaving).
Logged
Lurker
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 765
Norway
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #219 on: April 07, 2015, 06:22:37 PM »

So, a generation  = two years, or so, in Scotland. Tongue
Logged
Angel of Death
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,411
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #220 on: April 07, 2015, 09:39:35 PM »

Surely another hung parliament must mean the end of FPTP?

Actual quote from someone way more right-on and constitutionally 'progressive' than me at the time of the AV referendum: 'you know, I rather like dear old First Past The Post.'

Obviously I'm thinking of proportional representation this time, not AV. Of course, the big question is how the SNP feels about it.
Logged
YL
YorkshireLiberal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,546
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #221 on: April 08, 2015, 01:53:04 AM »

(It was estimated in 2005 that Iraq cost Labour 3% and 3% only)

I would argue that, in the context of UK general election swings, 3% is actually quite a lot for a single issue.  And there are still people who won't vote Labour, or are reluctant to do so, because of Iraq; I know some of them.

[I'd be a bit sceptical of any precise claim about how big the effect was, anyway; it's not going to be an easy thing to measure.]
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #222 on: April 08, 2015, 03:53:06 AM »

YouGov 'absolutely certain to vote' figure is 69%. At this point in the 2010 campaign it was 63%. Which would point to a turnout of 71% or so.
Logged
bore
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,275
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #223 on: April 08, 2015, 06:45:42 AM »

So, a generation  = two years, or so, in Scotland. Tongue

I mean that's true in parts of Glasgow Tongue
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #224 on: April 08, 2015, 10:03:47 AM »

Ashcroft constituency polls (salt necessary? Too early to say):

Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 46  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.