FL/OH/PA-Quinnipiac: Hillary strong in OH, weaker in FL and PA

[MT Treasurer]

Florida

Bush: 45%
Clinton: 42%

Rubio: 44%
Clinton: 46%

Paul: 43%
Clinton: 46%

Christie: 39%
Clinton: 44%

Huckabee: 40%
Clinton: 48%

Walker: 40%
Clinton: 46%

Cruz: 39%
Clinton: 48%

Ohio

Clinton: 46%
Paul: 41%

Clinton: 47%
Bush: 38%

Clinton: 45%
Christie: 39%

Clinton: 49%
Huckabee: 39%

Clinton: 47%
Rubio: 38%

Clinton: 49%
Walker: 38%

Clinton: 48%
Cruz: 38%

Pennsylvania

Paul: 45%
Clinton: 44%

Christie: 40%
Clinton: 45%

Bush: 40%
Clinton: 46%

Huckabee: 41%
Clinton: 47%

Rubio: 42%
Clinton: 46%

Walker: 41%
Clinton: 46%

Cruz: 39%
Clinton: 48%

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/images/polling/sw/ps03312015_sgt63kd.pdf

[MT Treasurer]

I guess there is hope for the GOP in PA after all (though we need more polls to confirm this, obviously). However, PA + OH + FL added to the Romney states would mean a Republican victory. Not THAT implausible, really. CO, WI, IA, VA, NH and NV would become irrelevant in such a scenario. It seems as if the Parties' Convention Choices were reasonable choices, after all.

Bad news for Hillary: FL voters think that Hillary Clinton is not honest and trustworthy (50-41), PA voters also think so (49-44). Ohio voters are split (47% say she is "honest and trustworthy", 46% don't think so).
Compare that to Jeb Bush: FL voters think he is honest and trustworthy by a wide margin (54-35), PA (45-36) and OH voters (42-34) think so too.

[MT Treasurer]

There is never hope for the GOP in PA.

I wonder if it would be that much harder to win than OH? Doubt it. Republicans should definitely contest it if it's a close election. Although it could be that those Quinnipiac PA numbers are outliers (especially when you compare it to the OH numbers), who knows...