Social Science History #7: Sigmund Freud
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 01:30:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Social Science History #7: Sigmund Freud
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion?
#1
FF
 
#2
HP
 
#3
This thread is the return of the repressed
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author Topic: Social Science History #7: Sigmund Freud  (Read 3397 times)
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 02, 2015, 07:04:37 PM »

Obligatory

Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2015, 07:15:56 PM »

Major FF despite his flaws.
Logged
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2015, 08:27:36 PM »
« Edited: April 02, 2015, 08:29:47 PM by traininthedistance »

Freud's project was fundamentally not about psychology as a science, but about the creation of a mythos for a post-God age. And, even in the absence of God, man needs his mythos-es.

His impact on literature and the humanities has been immense, and anyone who is interested in Modernism in any way needs to grapple with his legacy.

His actual theories, and the testability and/or truth-value they have?  Ludicrous, sexist dogs*t, but that's besides the point.  I've read my Joyce and Kafka, I have no choice but to vote FF.
Logged
Tetro Kornbluth
Gully Foyle
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,846
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2015, 09:42:13 PM »

Freud's project was fundamentally not about psychology as a science, but about the creation of a mythos for a post-God age. And, even in the absence of God, man needs his mythos-es.

The problem I would have that theory is that is definitely not how Freud saw his project. Also, the argument that it had no scientific implications is somewhat ruined by the role Quasi-Freudian theory played in, say, post-war American psychiatry (although a lot of the blame of its worst offenses came from the Neo-Freudians, not the man himself).

In saying that unlike some of the other subjects of these polls, this has much more ambiguous legacy.
Logged
tik 🪀✨
ComradeCarter
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,496
Australia
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2015, 08:05:45 AM »
« Edited: April 03, 2015, 08:08:32 AM by Tik »

That dialogue is hilarious.

As for an opinion of Freud.. well, as a person, he was creepy and strange. As for his work.. it was creepy and strange, although he did set some important foundations.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,157
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2015, 09:04:14 AM »
« Edited: April 03, 2015, 09:26:54 AM by Antonio V »

Most of his theories were probably crap and had a lot of disturbing undertones. Still, he sparked a discipline (which, by any means, I obviously would not call "science") that, despite its flaws, has critically helped humans to understand themselves. To speak for myself, the ego/id/superego structure plays a key role in my philosophical thoughts.

Voted option 3.
Logged
DemPGH
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,755
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2015, 09:20:22 AM »

Probably the first really good example of modern quack science (psychoanalysis, et. al.). Plus, I think he had some deep-seated issues himself. Pretty easy HP vote for me.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,709
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2015, 09:20:41 AM »

Leszek Kołakowski once wrote a jocular little piece about the future in which (amongst other things) Sigmund Freud's name had been misremembered as Sigmund Fraud. This strikes me as about right.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2015, 11:19:00 AM »

Wrong, but his wrongness was very important.
Logged
Deus Naturae
Deus naturae
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,637
Croatia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2015, 11:39:37 AM »

I feel like the people saying he was just a quack aren't actually aware of all of the stuff that they're dismissing as "quackery" by extension.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2015, 03:06:41 PM »

I have attempted to repress all memories of Freudian psychology from my mind.
Logged
Georg Ebner
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 410
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2015, 08:26:28 PM »

"'Psychoanalysis' applies. But only to its proponents." (E.Friedell)
Logged
compson III
sutpen
Rookie
**
Posts: 63
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 06, 2015, 12:44:29 AM »

Certainly no worse than ostensibly "empirical" modern psychology.
Logged
AutumnLeaf
Rookie
**
Posts: 26
Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas)


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2015, 11:05:01 PM »

malinowsky and the theory of the necessities Tongue
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.036 seconds with 13 queries.