WI: Tony Blair vs. David Cameron vs. Nick Clegg in 2010?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 02:05:03 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs?
  International What-ifs (Moderator: Dereich)
  WI: Tony Blair vs. David Cameron vs. Nick Clegg in 2010?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you vote?
#1
Labour: Blair
 
#2
Conservative: Cameron
 
#3
Liberal: Clegg
 
#4
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 77

Author Topic: WI: Tony Blair vs. David Cameron vs. Nick Clegg in 2010?  (Read 4465 times)
hangfan91
Rookie
**
Posts: 198
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 06, 2015, 12:49:57 AM »

WI Tony Blair doesn't resign in 2007 and lived till 2010 politically to fight the election? How would you have voted?

Also, do you think he could have delivered a fourth consecutive majority government? Or would he have fallen like Brown did?
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2015, 04:24:21 AM »

Tory majority with the Lib Dems second in the popular vote.
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,846
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2015, 09:16:19 AM »

Yeah assuming credit crunch still happens in 08/09 Blair isn't surviving, and the liberals would easily get 90+ seats whilst coming second on the share of the vote (not seats)

The only way that Blair could survive until 2010 is for
-No Iraq war in 2003
-Sacked Brown as Chancellor in 2005
-Somehow avoids the 2008 crash
Logged
Sec. of State Superique
Superique
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,305
Brazil


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 12, 2015, 06:23:53 PM »

Would vote for Clegg.
Logged
Wake Me Up When The Hard Border Ends
Anton Kreitzer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,167
Australia


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: 3.11

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 15, 2015, 09:53:03 AM »

Tory.
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,863
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 19, 2015, 09:08:24 AM »

CON 352
LAB 184
LIB 86
OTH 28

CON majority
Logged
BigVic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,492
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2015, 02:53:27 AM »
« Edited: June 01, 2015, 03:27:14 AM by BigVic »

CON 352
LAB 208
Lib Dem 56
Others 30

CON majority of 58. UK will vote for a change with a Conservative majority after 13 years of Labour rule
Logged
SATW
SunriseAroundTheWorld
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,463
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 19, 2015, 03:11:05 PM »

While I do like Blair, i'd vote for the Tories and Cameron. The UK needed a change.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: June 19, 2015, 04:05:55 PM »
« Edited: June 19, 2015, 04:09:39 PM by Phony Moderate »

This would have been good for the smaller parties. I'd imagine the PV vote to be:

Con - 33
Lab - 26
Lib Dems - 27
UKIP - 5
BNP - 3
Greens - 2

Though UKIP's share still pales in comparison to 2015.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: June 27, 2015, 08:40:42 PM »

If Blair somehow lasted that long with those conditions he would go out in an epic collapse similar to what happened with Major. Very ironic considering that's how Blair came in.

See Cameron and the torries winning comfortably with the Lib Dem's fighting Labor in many seats. IDK if Lib's could get 2nd place but that could have been their best chance at doing so. 
Logged
BigVic
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,492
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: June 27, 2015, 11:22:36 PM »
« Edited: July 01, 2015, 03:23:03 AM by BigVic »




House of commons Composition made by. Very useful for WI's

http://tools.wmflabs.org/parliamentdiagram/westminsterinputform.html
Logged
Vega
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,253
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: July 01, 2015, 08:16:56 AM »

^^Slightly off topic, but thanks. I've been wondering what program the Wikipedia editors use on their parliament composition pages.

I just wish I could understand it better. Tongue
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2015, 04:27:31 PM »

The Lib Dems might actually gain seats in 2015 while everyone else loses seats. Labour would still be too unpopular to win only five years removed, and the Conservatives won't have the seats to gain.
Logged
JackV982
JackSchirmdog982
Rookie
**
Posts: 49
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2015, 08:09:11 PM »

David Cameron
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2015, 08:30:21 PM »

It is worth noting that because of the way votes are distributed, PV gains for the Tories and Lib Dems tend to cancel each other out. See 1983, 2005 and OTL 2010, or 1997 and 2015 for the reverse cases.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 15 queries.