Yale estimates concern for climate change by county

[t_host1]

  Yale was at the epicenter of the original hoax. In time, when it becomes relevant; there is a conversation article with then researchers at Yale that were co-conspirators with AlGores’ carbon exchange.

 They were assigned with the task to formulate values of consumption damages so to sell relief of conscience. They the researchers had to forfeit their commission admitting that stated causes were unmeasurable for a tradable tangible.

 At a quick glance Yale is measuring the effectiveness of their premise for the last 10 years or so.

 I’m in the camp that as the sun, a hydrogen star ignited, burns mass losing weight it expands in size creating more surface heat that we do/will notice. Water levels are rising because of gravities pull in the trillions of crystals entering earth. What is fascinating is that objects are attached to these crystals. Also I’m thinking the sun operates in a similar mode, drawing in its power.

 The Yale, Al Gore, carbon exchange was entirely winged to the point that they fooled themselves. Some did profit from the start up. At the time of the release of the article, it was a point of a conspiracy proudly being constructed.
 The more I think about it, it would be timely to match the past Yale work to the present. As I rummage thru my stuff I’ll will have to keep an eye out for that artical, I have it somewhere.

[t_host1]

 Yale was at the epicenter of the original hoax. In time, when it becomes relevant; there is a conversation article with then researchers at Yale that were co-conspirators with AlGores’ carbon exchange.

 They were assigned with the task to formulate values of consumption damages so to sell relief of conscience. They the researchers had to forfeit their commission admitting that stated causes were unmeasurable for a tradable tangible.

 At a quick glance Yale is measuring the effectiveness of their premise for the last 10 years or so.

 I’m in the camp that as the sun, a hydrogen star ignited, burns mass losing weight it expands in size creating more surface heat that we do/will notice. Water levels are rising because of gravities pull in the trillions of crystals entering earth. What is fascinating is that objects are attached to these crystals. Also I’m thinking the sun operates in a similar mode, drawing in its power.

 The Yale, Al Gore, carbon exchange was entirely winged to the point that they fooled themselves. Some did profit from the start up. At the time of the release of the article, it was a point of a conspiracy proudly being constructed.
 The more I think about it, it would be timely to match the past Yale work to the present. As I rummage thru my stuff I’ll will have to keep an eye out for that artical, I have it somewhere.

Manmade global climate weirding at its best.

What happens if the magnetic field on earth takes a vacation or the poles reverse?  If what you're saying is true...rapid and sudden global warming?

And how does cern impact this?  Already people mumble about our magnetopause sucking in towards earth when we fire that thing up.  True or not...the magnetopause is acting erratically of late.

on the... rapid and sudden global warming? No, more like a many generational slow fry, then a sudden vacuum, implosion, black hole is one theory.

The magnetic field is a miracle, another gift - taking a vacation would not be good for humans; balance, brain computation.
The pole shift/reverse, it has happened before now.

[t_host1]

I think i get it.  Like popcorn!  

One question...would a trainwreck result from a reversal?

 Yes –for the heavily tech reliant and confused. The Si-Fi thrillers of water will become a reality - water moving in the path of least resistance. Water in peace times is pleasingly stimulating, necessary and there is a lot of it.
 The questions is, will it be sudden or slow with warnings to the extent of the range to their new locations?
Seems like the pole shift would be first, almost like an arc of lightening, then the planet realigns to its new rotation, hopefully slowly. Imagine 1/3 – 1/2 of the weight of the planet on the move only having natural resistance to slow it down.  Accept where you are at present, make the most of it.
 BTW, do you have a boat?

[t_host1]

I think i get it.  Like popcorn! 

One question...would a trainwreck result from a reversal?

 Yes –for the heavily tech reliant and confused. The Si-Fi thrillers of water will become a reality - water moving in the path of least resistance. Water in peace times is pleasingly stimulating, necessary and there is a lot of it.
 The questions is, will it be sudden or slow with warnings to the extent of the range to their new locations?
Seems like the pole shift would be first, almost like an arc of lightening, then the planet realigns to its new rotation, hopefully slowly. Imagine 1/3 – 1/2 of the weight of the planet on the move only having natural resistance to slow it down.  Accept where you are at present, make the most of it.
 BTW, do you have a boat?

We have two.  Do you need one?

Thanks for asking, no, I'm good to go.

[t_host1]

Are we talking about magnetic pole shifts, or the poles for Earth's axis of rotation? They are not aligned with each other.

It was my understanding that a pole shift would alter the axis; or is it the tide change that messes things up? it is what happened last time, wasn't it? as far as the pole and axis, one is perpendicular of the other, isn't it? hum, I guess I'll have to look at all this again. yeah, a pole shift does change the equator. I think I'm confused about this now.

[t_host1]

Are we talking about magnetic pole shifts, or the poles for Earth's axis of rotation? They are not aligned with each other.

It was my understanding that a pole shift would alter the axis; or is it the tide change that messes things up? it is what happened last time, wasn't it? as far as the pole and axis, one is perpendicular of the other, isn't it? hum, I guess I'll have to look at all this again. yeah, a pole shift does change the equator. I think I'm confused about this now.

The Earth's magnetic pole shifts every few hundred thousand years, the last major shift was 780,000 years ago. The Earth's rotation can't shift without an outside force, such as from a collision by a giant asteroid. Even then it doesn't flip but might change speed and direction.

 
 Earths’ rotation changing from an asteroid collision would be the least negative outcome on the planet.
 Too think that a magnetic field shift on a suspended sphere of liquid and solid metals with its loose cargo of water not being affected - adversely altered, defies the excitement principles of the magnetic impulse, to push and pull.
 Now, IF, man were to affect a magnetic field pole shift, like, with the introduction of 10 million tesla’s a year being sold and used - running all over the planet – seems like that would be just as relevant of a poll question within this Yale survey.
  Just the same, I’m not removing oars from my prep’rs list of things to pick up.

[t_host1]

thanks Ibn Rushd,
 
 Snowguy716, is this what you are referring to?

 This only underlines that we are not in a static state of being.
Now, more wonderment, do you think that the just recent passing, a very close one, of a comet had just enough draw to have an effect such as this?


...could be the stars of the progressive left, the Obama transformation or the Clinton dynasty are out of alignment.