CO/IA/VA-Quinnipiac: Hillary quite weak, as Paul runs best against her
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 06:43:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
  CO/IA/VA-Quinnipiac: Hillary quite weak, as Paul runs best against her
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: CO/IA/VA-Quinnipiac: Hillary quite weak, as Paul runs best against her  (Read 2607 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 09, 2015, 05:19:47 AM »

Colorado

In the presidential race in Colorado, Paul gets 44 percent to Clinton's 41 percent and other Republicans are effectively tied as well:

    U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida gets 41 percent to Clinton's 40 percent;
    She ties former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee 41 - 41 percent;
    Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker gets 42 percent to her 41 percent;
    Clinton gets 42 percent to 41 percent for U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas;
    She gets 41 percent to Bush's 38 percent;
    Clinton gets 41 percent to 39 percent for New Jersey Gov. Christopher Christie.

Iowa

Every Republican is tied or close to Clinton in Iowa:

    She gets 41 percent to 39 percent for Christie:
    She gets 41 percent to 40 percent for Bush;
    Paul at 43 percent to Clinton's 42 percent;
    Huckabee ties her 42 - 42 percent;
    Clinton edges Walker 44 - 40 percent;
    She gets 43 percent to 40 percent against either Rubio or Cruz.

Virginia

Clinton leads Bush 47 - 40 percent in Virginia, compared to a 42 - 42 percent tie February 18, She gets 47 percent to Paul's 43 percent, her closest race in the Old Dominion. In other races:

    Clinton tops Christie 46 - 40 percent;
    Clinton over Huckabee 48 - 40 percent;
    Clinton tops Walker 47 - 40 percent;
    She beats Rubio 48 - 40 percent;
    Clinton tops Cruz 49 - 39 percent.

...

From March 29 - April 7 Quinnipiac University surveyed:

    894 Colorado voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.3 percentage points;
    948 Iowa voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.2 percentage points;
    961 Virginia voters with a margin of error of +/- 3.2 percentage points.

Live interviewers call land lines and cell phones.

http://www.quinnipiac.edu/news-and-events/quinnipiac-university-poll/2016-presidential-swing-state-polls/release-detail?ReleaseID=2184
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2015, 05:21:38 AM »

How inevitable ... Roll Eyes
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2015, 05:23:46 AM »

Here are the results in a more readable format:

Colorado

Paul 44%
Clinton 41%

Clinton 41%
Christie 39%

Clinton 41%
Bush 38%

Walker 42%
Clinton 41%

Clinton 41%
Huckabee 41%

Rubio 41%
Clinton 40%

Clinton 42%
Cruz 41%

Iowa

Paul 43%
Clinton 42%

Clinton 41%
Christie 39%

Clinton 41%
Bush 40%

Clinton 44%
Walker 40%

Clinton 42%
Huckabee 42%

Clinton 43%
Rubio 40%

Clinton 43%
Cruz 40%

Virginia

Clinton 47%
Paul 43%

Clinton 46%
Christie 40%

Clinton 47%
Bush 40%

Clinton 47%
Walker 40%

Clinton 48%
Huckabee 40%

Clinton 48%
Rubio 40%

Clinton 49%
Cruz 39%
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,795
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2015, 05:24:31 AM »

So Virginia is more Democratic that Colorado and Iowa? Sorry but I don't buy that.

Also, why so many undecideds in the first two? It's not like the candidates lack name recognition.
Logged
Gallium
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 270
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2015, 05:25:10 AM »

Looks like it actually might be true that Virginia is solid D and Iowa and Colorado hate Hillary!!!! Tongue
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2015, 05:44:23 AM »

I won't bother to list everyone's favorability in all three states, but, to give an indication of the relative name recognition of the various candidates, here's the %age of respondents in CO/IA/VA who answered "haven't heard enough about [him/her]" when asked their opinion of the person in question:

Clinton 6 / 5 / 4
Christie 29 / 31 / 25
Bush 25 / 28 / 28
Paul 33 / 35 / 33
Huckabee 29 / 27 / 28
Walker 50 / 50 / 53
Rubio 42 / 54 / 44
Cruz 36 / 42 / 31
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,464
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2015, 06:14:40 AM »

Yeah, if Paul is the nomimee, she would do worst against a fresher face than Walker. But, the 272 firewall includes OH or CO. She can certainly either of the two, not necessarily winning both.
Logged
Gallium
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 270
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2015, 06:28:00 AM »

Clinton's numbers may be down in CO compared to two months ago, but the margins are exactly where they were in their February 2014 poll, when Paul was leading her by 3% and she was only 1% ahead of Cruz (and that was when she was further ahead in national polls). I think the results show a continuing poor fit for Hillary there rather than any Paulmentum or emailgate. But it'd be good to see other pollsters.

Also unsurprising that Bush is doing the worst there. He may have to put Martinez or Sandoval on his ticket if he wants to make a play in the Mountain West (if he's the nominee).
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,464
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2015, 06:33:44 AM »

My map includes picking Hickenlooper as the running mate. She wont win IA or CO on her own.
Logged
Free Bird
TheHawk
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,917
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.84, S: -5.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2015, 08:39:32 AM »

Being generous and giving Walker wisconsin, Ohio, and Florida, this gives a 272 win. The ship is certainly sinking, and the fact that it is so early should concern Democrats
Logged
porky88
Rookie
**
Posts: 78
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 09, 2015, 08:39:58 AM »

Quinnipiac seems to be showing numbers that are more favorable to Republicans than other pollsters. Either they are onto something or they are misjudging the electorate.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 09, 2015, 08:42:00 AM »

Paul seems to do fairly well against Clinton in many polls 
Logged
Devils30
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,986
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.06, S: -4.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 09, 2015, 08:43:47 AM »

Virginia meanwhile looks like it's continuing it's Democratic trend. Hillary by winning VA WI NV NH PA can win without Colorado Iowa Florida Ohio.
Logged
Former Democrat
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 250
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 09, 2015, 08:44:12 AM »

VA was a red state till 2006
but more and more DC people moving to VA changed it to a purple and trending slightly blue
but still winnable as the mid-terms in 2014 showed
in 2008 and 2012 it was -like OH - presenting the national numbers

IA is trending red more and more

CO is  a purple with conservatives Indy voters it depends on the canddate
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,464
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 09, 2015, 08:52:55 AM »

Uh, Clinton will certainly win CO, NV, Ia, Pa, WI and NH for 272 electors.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2015, 09:28:50 AM »

I wonder if they are using 2014 turnout models.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2015, 09:34:13 AM »

I wonder if they are using 2014 turnout models.

They aren't using any turnout model at all.  This is a poll of registered voters, not likely voters.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 09, 2015, 09:35:37 AM »

Rand Paul is a great challenge to Hillary, but he's not going to win the nomination.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 09, 2015, 09:38:56 AM »

I just looked at the numbers again. Bush leading Clinton by 7 in Virginia is a total joke. When did Quinnipiac become a Republican internal pollster?
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 09, 2015, 09:39:44 AM »

I just looked at the numbers again. Bush leading Clinton by 7 in Virginia is a total joke. When did Quinnipiac become a Republican internal pollster?

Hillary leads him by 7, not the other way round.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 09, 2015, 09:57:03 AM »

I just looked at the numbers again. Bush leading Clinton by 7 in Virginia is a total joke. When did Quinnipiac become a Republican internal pollster?

Hillary leads him by 7, not the other way round.
Oh, thanks. I was wondering why the numbers looked more ridiculous the second time around.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 09, 2015, 09:59:06 AM »

I don't believe those CO polls for more than a second. Hillary is obviously weak there, but after the 2014 Quinnipiac polls of CO, I can't trust them especially if this is RV.

IA is more than believable, and I'm confident Walker will improve with name recognition.

VA seems fine, but the most unbelievable part is that Paul performs best there. Cutting the whole federal government must be playing great there.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 09, 2015, 10:05:50 AM »

Polling results with less than 45% for either candidate in a binary election have little value in predicting the end result.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,795
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 09, 2015, 10:08:03 AM »

VA seems fine, but the most unbelievable part is that Paul performs best there. Cutting the whole federal government must be playing great there.

So must be cutting ethanol subsidies in Iowa, at least according to this poll.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,634
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 09, 2015, 10:15:48 AM »

Way too many undecideds, worthless polls.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 13 queries.