Yeah, I'm going there...despite the inevitable screams of "OMG sexism!" (OK, maybe this thread is a bit, but only to illustrate what she'll face). We all know that she will be judged by a different standard - by the media, by the voters, by everyone - for better
and for worse. This will be one of the cases of "worse".
Evidence pretty flatly shows that she had plastic surgery sometime before 2008; in
many pictures from 2000-2006 she looked as old or older than she does today, then magically appeared
rejuvenated for the 2008 campaign.
There are some (highly speculative and not really trustworthy) sources saying that she actually
has had more plastic surgery recently, but I can't really tell - fairly recent photos seem to show her
a bit more fresh-looking than last year, but it could just be lighting/conditions, or rest.
But the reality is that
she will be 69 years and 1 week old on Election Day 2016. The same criticism that Democrats levied at John McCain for being "too old" - at age 72 - in 2008 will be levied at us (regardless of the "men die earlier than women" narrative/fact). Women are judged based on physical impressions more so, and so both substantive age criticisms along with aesthetics are going to be part of the campaign. It may very well prove to be a larger than expected liability. On the other hand, I could see two potential reasons behind her not having substantial work done:
- 1) She legitimately doesn't care about pandering to this type of logic anymore at her age, and refuses to embrace it
- 2) She and/or the campaign think that by not doing it, there will be a subconscious boost in her authenticity
If you were Hillary's campaign manager, what would you recommend?