Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 11:59:07 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]
Poll
Question: Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP?
#1
Tammy Baldwin (WI)
 
#2
Joe Biden (DE)
 
#3
Cory Booker (NJ)
 
#4
Julian Castro (TX)
 
#5
Howard Dean (VT)
 
#6
Rahm Emanuel (IL)
 
#7
Al Franken (MN)
 
#8
Heidi Heitkamp (ND)
 
#9
Al Gore (TN)
 
#10
John Hickenlooper (CO)
 
#11
Amy Klobuchar (MN)
 
#12
Jack Markell (DE)
 
#13
Jay Nixon (MO)
 
#14
Martin O'Malley (MD)
 
#15
Deval Patrick (MA)
 
#16
Brian Schweitzer (MT)
 
#17
Mark Warner (VA)
 
#18
Elizabeth Warren (MA)
 
#19
Tim Kaine (VA)
 
#20
Mark Dayton (MN)
 
#21
Steve Bullock (MT)
 
#22
Maggie Hassan (NH)
 
#23
Peter Shumlin (VT)
 
#24
Terry McAuliffe (VA)
 
#25
Jeanne Shaheen (NH)
 
#26
Joe Manchin (WV)
 
#27
Sherrod Brown (OH)
 
#28
Claire McCaskill (MO)
 
#29
Joe Donnelly (IN)
 
#30
Jon Tester (MT)
 
#31
Maria Cantwell (WA)
 
#32
Michael Bennet (CO)
 
#33
Martin Heinrich (NM)
 
#34
Bernie Sanders (VT)
 
#35
Andrew Cuomo (NY)
 
#36
Kristen Gillibrand (NY)
 
#37
Other (please specify in thread)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 93

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: Who should Hillary Clinton pick as her VP?  (Read 8500 times)
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,925
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: April 18, 2015, 04:24:44 AM »
« edited: April 18, 2015, 04:33:09 AM by President Johnson »

I hope it's going to be Tim Kaine. He is the perfect ticket balance: A man who is ten years younger than Hillary and from a swing state. And he has experience in both the executive as Governor and in the legislative as a Senator.

Al Franken and Michael Bennet are good choices as well.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: April 18, 2015, 12:12:12 PM »

By the time Hillary is willing to answer VP questions at all ( a year from now?) she will be asked  whether she'd consider a woman and give the obvious answer: gender and ethnicity are not a factor. She'll probably avoid a pick that would be awkward to explain or look too political, like Castro, or even someone like Bullock.

I used to think if, come selection time, she had a double digit lead or close to it, if she'd be emboldened to pick a woman or even McAuliffe but with the choice happening 2 months earlier than usual, the chances of that go down a bit.

As far as political considerations of the VP pick, it will depend on the specifics of who she is running against, what issues are in play but historically, running mates almost never help; people vote for or against the top of the ticket. Kaine's being from Virginia is a mild asset. If the nominee is Bush or Rubio, his Spanish fluency helps. If it's Walker or Kasich, his Christian fluency helps. As the first statewide officeholder to endorse Obama in 2007, he puts to bed any delusions about that still being a thing. But really, that is all gravy. Kaine's biggest asset is really just that he is uncontroversial and won't create a distraction

The downside is, unless I'm wrong, his appointed successor serves only until a 2017 special which would  put his seat in play a year earlier than scheduled. Dems would either have to defend it twice in 2 years, or, like Brown-Warren, have a chance to win it back in 2018 if they lose it. Hillary obviously sees what's happening with the Loretta Lynch nomination and with senate control up in the air, Sherrod Brown, Martin Heinrich are absolute no-go's. Probably Cory Booker too. (Christie did call a special election to replace Lautenberg, but that was with an eye on his own re-election setting up a presidential run. If Menendez's seat opens up now, wouldn't be all that shocking to see Christie flip. My favorite scenario to imagine is Christie's presidential run being a disaster, Booker getting tapped for VP and for the replacement, Christie relishing pissing off the party. Still, Booker is doubtful.) Bennet will run for re-election and if he's looking strong, just leave him there.

I also think everyone is exaggerating the importance of a VP being young. Most of the weight in getting young voters to the polls will fall to people like Obama, Warren, etc. Having a VP in their 50s as opposed to 60s just isn't a big deal. That said, there aren't a ton of great choices who are over 60. John Lynch, Gary Locke and that might be it.

Kaine looks a stronger frontrunner to be VP than any Republican presidential candidate is to win any state primary. Which, by the way, is ridiculous.
Logged
Attorney General, Senator-Elect, & Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,723
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: April 18, 2015, 12:48:03 PM »

Does New Jersey law actually explicitly allow Christie to refuse to call a special election, allowing the appointment to serve until the next regular election? If it doesn't, he's not going to get away with not calling one. As Cuomo demonstrated with the NY-11 election, just "forgetting" about it and hoping everyone forgets that a special election is needed doesn't work.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.