Pacific v. Poirot

[Ebowed]

I would appreciate some elaboration from the Governor as to how Mr Poirot and his presence constitute a threat to public health.

[Ebowed]

I don't care for Mr Griffin's word choice with respect to the Governor at all, but I still would prefer further clarification as to how 'bronyism' or 'ponyism' are legally defined and what threat to public health and safety it is meant to constitute.

[Ebowed]

Gentlemen, based on my understanding, Poirot is not a threat to the public health or safety of the Pacific.  Therefore he cannot be barred from entering the Pacific or face any criminal charges for having done so.