WI-Marquette: Feingold (D) with dominant lead against Sen. Johnson (R) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 07:18:46 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 Senatorial Election Polls
  WI-Marquette: Feingold (D) with dominant lead against Sen. Johnson (R) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: WI-Marquette: Feingold (D) with dominant lead against Sen. Johnson (R)  (Read 7079 times)
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,141
United States


« on: April 17, 2015, 03:18:25 AM »
« edited: April 17, 2015, 03:36:41 AM by Sawx, King in the North »

Exagerrated a bit there, but I assume that Hassan will run. If she decides against a run, this is a Toss-up and lean R at best. Anyway, my thoughts:
1. NH is no longer a swing state, it is trending to the left.
2. Ayotte is not that popular (even among Republicans), while Hassan is really popular.
3. Possible Hillary coattails because the GOP will almost certainly lose NH in 2016.
4. Ayotte is not moderate enough for a state like NH. She doesn't have the same reputation that Mark Kirk has.

I don't even think Hassan will run, but if she does, Ayotte shouldn't be counted out.

1. Wouldn't go that far yet. It tilts D, but it's not a full-on lean.
2. The Senate is more polarizing than the governor's mansion.
3. The right Republican (like a Romney-type or even Rand) can still win here, even against Hillary. Anything can happen.
4. I guarantee you, by the time 2016 is over, Ayotte will be seen as more moderate to NH than Kirk is to IL. And even then, moderation doesn't really matter in NH. We're very independent-minded, and if you make a bit of an effort to compromise, you'll do well here. She's probably closer to Judd Gregg and the Sununus than Susan Collins, but if you give off an air of pragmatism, you can get elected.
Logged
free my dawg
SawxDem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,141
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2015, 05:49:33 PM »

1. Yeah, but it's certainly not the swing state that it was in 2000 or 2004 any more.
2. Agreed.
3. If a Romney-type Republican was a great fit for NH, why would Romney lose the state so badly? Tongue (he did worse in NH than in PA).
4. Sounds plausible.

*Of course. We aren't denying it's trending D.

*I'd imagine his flip-flopping and his other comments didn't help.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 14 queries.