How soon will Pres Hillary Clinton Bomb Iran
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 07:26:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  How soon will Pres Hillary Clinton Bomb Iran
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: When Will Hillary Bomb Iran?
#1
Inauguration Day
 
#2
Within 6 months
 
#3
First term
 
#4
Second Term
 
#5
Never
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 76

Author Topic: How soon will Pres Hillary Clinton Bomb Iran  (Read 2147 times)
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 17, 2015, 12:24:06 AM »

Let the bombs fall.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,580
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2015, 12:36:36 AM »

Inaugration day
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,053
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2015, 12:41:52 AM »


No, no. She'll do it before the election.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2015, 12:58:20 AM »

This really is getting stupid...
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,615


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2015, 01:04:38 AM »

She'll definitely take a harder line than Saint Reagan, who got the hostages released literally 15 minutes into his Presidency.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2015, 01:17:40 AM »

First term probably.
Logged
CountryClassSF
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,530


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2015, 01:32:57 AM »

The sooner the better!
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2015, 02:16:58 AM »


Wasn't there just a thread recently about how people here don't hate on Hillary? Yet I swear I see a thread similar to this at least once a week. One of the curiosities of the Atlas Forum is how they somehow manage to maintain the cognitive dissonance of thinking legions of Hillary hacks run the place and crush the minority of dissenters into the ground, while simultaneously circlejerking about how much they all hate her in countless threads. Truly fascinating.

Anyway, the obvious answer is right before her re-election so she can get a rally around the flag effect and maintain her grip on power (normal).
Logged
HAnnA MArin County
semocrat08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,037
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2015, 02:33:54 AM »

It's getting to the point where the "true progressives" on this forum are getting indistinguishable from the right-wing haters.
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,234
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2015, 05:45:02 AM »

Probably in a couple of minutes
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2015, 05:49:37 AM »

It's getting to the point where the "true progressives" on this forum are getting indistinguishable from the right-wing haters.

If you're irritating both sides so well, you must be doing something right Tongue
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2015, 06:09:12 AM »

It's getting to the point where the "true progressives" on this forum are getting indistinguishable from the right-wing haters.

Their in a straitjacket screaming that somehow somehow warren/sanders being elected will be able to bend the will of the GOP congress and force them to help implement socialism.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 17, 2015, 07:06:02 AM »

In all seriousness, the entire GOP field just about has vowed to scrap the Iran deal on Day 1 and is more likely to get us into war with Iran. And even in an alternate reality where Paul could win the nomination, Netanyahu would be more likely to act on his own. So as far as maintaining stability in the Middle East, Hillary is a better choice than any Republican
Logged
Brewer
BrewerPaul
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,622


Political Matrix
E: -6.90, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 17, 2015, 07:13:54 AM »

In all seriousness, the entire GOP field just about has vowed to scrap the Iran deal on Day 1 and is more likely to get us into war with Iran. And even in an alternate reality where Paul could win the nomination, Netanyahu would be more likely to act on his own. So as far as maintaining stability in the Middle East, Hillary is a better choice than any Republican

She voted fir Iraq ur argument is invalid!!!!!
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 17, 2015, 07:23:41 AM »

In all seriousness, the entire GOP field just about has vowed to scrap the Iran deal on Day 1 and is more likely to get us into war with Iran. And even in an alternate reality where Paul could win the nomination, Netanyahu would be more likely to act on his own. So as far as maintaining stability in the Middle East, Hillary is a better choice than any Republican

She voted fir Iraq ur argument is invalid!!!!!

I know you're kidding but that was actually a terrible vote. But even with it, extremely doubtful Hillary would have ordered the Iraq invasion had she been president.
Logged
Brewer
BrewerPaul
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,622


Political Matrix
E: -6.90, S: -6.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 17, 2015, 07:29:41 AM »

In all seriousness, the entire GOP field just about has vowed to scrap the Iran deal on Day 1 and is more likely to get us into war with Iran. And even in an alternate reality where Paul could win the nomination, Netanyahu would be more likely to act on his own. So as far as maintaining stability in the Middle East, Hillary is a better choice than any Republican

She voted fir Iraq ur argument is invalid!!!!!

I know you're kidding but that was actually a terrible vote. But even with it, extremely doubtful Hillary would have ordered the Iraq invasion had she been president.


I can certainly agree with that.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 17, 2015, 09:58:33 AM »

In all seriousness, the entire GOP field just about has vowed to scrap the Iran deal on Day 1 and is more likely to get us into war with Iran. And even in an alternate reality where Paul could win the nomination, Netanyahu would be more likely to act on his own. So as far as maintaining stability in the Middle East, Hillary is a better choice than any Republican

She voted fir Iraq ur argument is invalid!!!!!

I know you're kidding but that was actually a terrible vote. But even with it, extremely doubtful Hillary would have ordered the Iraq invasion had she been president.

Yeah, you are lying to yourself now LOL

Lying to yourself is when you think Rand Paul has any chance of being the nominee. Or when you think Hillary as president is more likely to lead to a war in the region than any Republican.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,235
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 17, 2015, 11:20:57 AM »

She will probably do it by 2018.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,806


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 17, 2015, 11:45:13 AM »


Wasn't there just a thread recently about how people here don't hate on Hillary? Yet I swear I see a thread similar to this at least once a week. One of the curiosities of the Atlas Forum is how they somehow manage to maintain the cognitive dissonance of thinking legions of Hillary hacks run the place and crush the minority of dissenters into the ground, while simultaneously circlejerking about how much they all hate her in countless threads. Truly fascinating.

Anyway, the obvious answer is right before her re-election so she can get a rally around the flag effect and maintain her grip on power (normal).

Yes- it's funny how you're constantly accused of being a Hillary hack, yet there are many anti-Hillary hacks as evidenced by this thread.
Logged
MustLuvMavericks
Rookie
**
Posts: 30


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 17, 2015, 12:54:02 PM »

In the Senate, HRC tried to have Iran's National Guard declared a "terrorist group," placing the country within the scope of the "Global War on Terror." It's really not that inconceivable that she'd work with the GOP to start the conflict with Iran that they and Netanyahu are dreaming about.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,806


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2015, 01:02:16 PM »

In the Senate, HRC tried to have Iran's National Guard declared a "terrorist group," placing the country within the scope of the "Global War on Terror." It's really not that inconceivable that she'd work with the GOP to start the conflict with Iran that they and Netanyahu are dreaming about.

She also supports (and sent Jake Sullivan to lay the groundwork for in 2012) the nuclear deal signed with Iran. Even many of those opposed to the deal wouldn't start a war with Iran. So it's even more absurd to think that someone who supports it would.

I mean, even the Bush administration, certainly no nest of doves, held back on attacking Iran in 2006-2008.
Logged
AelroseB
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 278


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 17, 2015, 01:36:46 PM »

She doesn't have the guts.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,053
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 17, 2015, 03:07:57 PM »

It's getting to the point where the "true progressives" on this forum are getting indistinguishable from the right-wing haters.

Oh, my feelings toward Obama are even more negative than toward her.
Logged
MustLuvMavericks
Rookie
**
Posts: 30


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 17, 2015, 04:01:53 PM »

In the Senate, HRC tried to have Iran's National Guard declared a "terrorist group," placing the country within the scope of the "Global War on Terror." It's really not that inconceivable that she'd work with the GOP to start the conflict with Iran that they and Netanyahu are dreaming about.

She also supports (and sent Jake Sullivan to lay the groundwork for in 2012) the nuclear deal signed with Iran. Even many of those opposed to the deal wouldn't start a war with Iran. So it's even more absurd to think that someone who supports it would.

I mean, even the Bush administration, certainly no nest of doves, held back on attacking Iran in 2006-2008.

She's running for President and trying to win the support of the Obama coalition, so from here on out I'll be separating her rhetoric from her actions. All a Clinton admin would have to do with the framework agreement in place would be to distort intelligence to say Iran was violating the terms, which isn't outside the realm of possibility given her going along with W's lies and her and her allies in the State Dept lying about Bashar Assad.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 17, 2015, 04:11:29 PM »

In the Senate, HRC tried to have Iran's National Guard declared a "terrorist group," placing the country within the scope of the "Global War on Terror." It's really not that inconceivable that she'd work with the GOP to start the conflict with Iran that they and Netanyahu are dreaming about.

Yeah, Netanyahu is the bad guy. Youre quite the typcial young leftist completely indoctrinated in leftist propaganda.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 15 queries.