Could the election of 1944 have been delayed?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 07:07:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Could the election of 1944 have been delayed?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Could the election of 1944 have been delayed?  (Read 1287 times)
buritobr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,662


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 17, 2015, 07:39:01 PM »

Does the constitution allow an election to be delayed?
Did someone consider this possibility in 1944?
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,065
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2015, 07:41:36 PM »

No, it would be unconstitutional. If the Civil War wouldn't delay an election, nothing will.
Logged
Skill and Chance
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,677
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2015, 01:21:38 AM »

Coincidentally, this is the primary reason I support the electoral college.  Imagine an earthquake in L.A. or a Category 5 hurricane in Houston the day before the election.
Logged
President Johnson
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,888
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.70


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2015, 04:21:03 AM »

No, it could not. Even the election of 1864 was not delayed, although some states left the union at this time.
Logged
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2015, 05:11:33 PM »

Coincidentally, this is the primary reason I support the electoral college.  Imagine an earthquake in L.A. or a Category 5 hurricane in Houston the day before the election.

The way to solve that is to have contingency built into the system so say displaced people can vote via absentee in an emergency.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 19, 2015, 10:40:06 PM »

Nope because we have fixed terms.

In England for instance it could and has happened. They didn't vote at all from 1910 to 1918, and from 1935-1945 but here the show has to go on.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,810
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2015, 12:01:04 PM »

No, it would be unconstitutional. If the Civil War wouldn't delay an election, nothing will.

This. If Lincoln ran during a domestic conflict, a foreign one would not justify a delay.
Logged
Nym90
nym90
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 16,260
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -2.96

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2015, 10:44:06 AM »

Coincidentally, this is the primary reason I support the electoral college.  Imagine an earthquake in L.A. or a Category 5 hurricane in Houston the day before the election.

Contingencies could be accounted for on a localized and case by case basis.

For example, the NYC primary for mayor and other offices was originally scheduled for 9/11/01 and then delayed (I assume those who had already cast ballots in the hour prior to the attacks had to revote?).
Logged
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,863
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2015, 03:45:11 PM »

Coincidentally, this is the primary reason I support the electoral college.  Imagine an earthquake in L.A. or a Category 5 hurricane in Houston the day before the election.

Contingencies could be accounted for on a localized and case by case basis.

For example, the NYC primary for mayor and other offices was originally scheduled for 9/11/01 and then delayed (I assume those who had already cast ballots in the hour prior to the attacks had to revote?).

Realistically, that wouldn't be necessary as anyone who had voted prior to the polls being prematurely closed would have had their names "taken out of the books" of whatever it is they do in NYC. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.