Donald Trump's classy tweet about Clinton

[Mr. Morden]

http://dailycaller.com/2015/04/17/trump-how-can-hillary-satisfy-america-if-she-cant-satisfy-her-husband/

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Exactly.

[Flake]

[Maxwell]

Exactly.

May this post be ingrained and remembered if he tries to delete it.

Donald Trump is human garbage, move along, nothing to see here.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

"If Hillary was my wife, I'd fire her."

That'll close the gender gap.

[Brewer]

That's right, I hate it when the President can't fulfill the country's sexual desires.

[Illuminati Blood Drinker]

Exactly.

So at the end of the day Wulfric's fanatical opposition to Hillary was a product of him being sexist garbage. I'm actually somewhat surprised.

[Panda Express]

No point in getting shocked folks, there's gonna be a lot of these sorts of comments this cycle.

[JonathanSwift]

The Donald is spot on, as usual.

[Sumner 1868]

Why is anybody surprised by this? Donald Trump is a narcissist who has years of idiotic comments under his belt. It's a miracle he went a whole tweet without mentioning his hair.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Exactly.

So at the end of the day Wulfric's fanatical opposition to Hillary was a product of him being sexist garbage. I'm actually somewhat surprised.

Believe what you like.

TLDR: She's too liberal for my tastes and for the moment there's still hope that republicans will nominate someone (fairly) moderate. But as I have said in the past: if the Republicans nominate Cruz, Carson, Walker, Santorum, Huckabee, etc., I will endorse and vote for Hillary.

[Lincoln Republican]

Trump's membership in the Republican Party should be revoked.

[Illuminati Blood Drinker]

Exactly.

So at the end of the day Wulfric's fanatical opposition to Hillary was a product of him being sexist garbage. I'm actually somewhat surprised.

Believe what you like.

TLDR: She's too liberal for my tastes and for the moment there's still hope that republicans will nominate someone (fairly) moderate. But as I have said in the past: if the Republicans nominate Cruz, Carson, Walker, Santorum, Huckabee, etc., I will endorse and vote for Hillary.

You literally nodded along to a tweet implying that a) if you're a woman and your husband cheats, that's your fault because you couldn't "satisfy" him, and b) that a) represents such a failing on the woman's part that it literally disqualifies her from being a good President. Given this, and your fanatical latching onto the hot anti-Hillary sh**t of the month (Lincoln Chafee - seriously? Though you aren't alone in this regard, I'll grant you that), makes me doubt there's any circumstance you'd consider voting for Hillary short of the GOP nominating Zombie Hitler with Attila the Hun as running mate.

Seriously. You can oppose a female candidate without nodding along as human garbage like Trump rant about how it's the woman's fault when her husband cheats because SHE DINT SATISFY HER MANLY MAN LIKE A GOOD WIMMINZ SHULD. I usually think IceSpear is wrong 95% of the time when he says people's opposition to Hillary has roots in sexism, but let's just say I wouldn't be surprised if this was an occasion where that 5% managed to fire.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Exactly.

So at the end of the day Wulfric's fanatical opposition to Hillary was a product of him being sexist garbage. I'm actually somewhat surprised.

Believe what you like.

TLDR: She's too liberal for my tastes and for the moment there's still hope that republicans will nominate someone (fairly) moderate. But as I have said in the past: if the Republicans nominate Cruz, Carson, Walker, Santorum, Huckabee, etc., I will endorse and vote for Hillary.

You literally nodded along to a tweet implying that a) if you're a woman and your husband cheats, that's your fault because you couldn't "satisfy" him, and b) that a) represents such a failing on the woman's part that it literally disqualifies her from being a good President. Given this, and your fanatical latching onto the hot anti-Hillary sh**t of the month (Lincoln Chafee - seriously? Though you aren't alone in this regard, I'll grant you that), makes me doubt there's any circumstance you'd consider voting for Hillary short of the GOP nominating Zombie Hitler with Attila the Hun as running mate.

Seriously. You can oppose a female candidate without nodding along as human garbage like Trump rant about how it's the woman's fault when her husband cheats because SHE DINT SATISFY HER MANLY MAN LIKE A GOOD WIMMINZ SHULD. I usually think IceSpear is wrong 95% of the time when he says people's opposition to Hillary has roots in sexism, but let's just say I wouldn't be surprised if this was an occasion where that 5% managed to fire.

I will never vote for Ted Cruz/Mike Huckabee/Rick Santorum/Sarah Palin/Donald Trump in a general election, no matter how much you think I will, and I'd only do it in a primary to give a democrat I like an easy win (not ruling out Walker/Carson in every possible case, though it'd probably have to be them against a literal socialist, which HRC is thankfully not.). I've said I fear the far right more than the far left, and for good reason. The far-left would just spend us into horrible credit ratings in some bizarre attempt to make everyone equal. The far-right would do far worse, doing everything possible to lose jobs, then cutting as many entitlements as possible and throwing out the old, unlucky, and sick out onto the street to fight for food and health care.

As far as Hillary's primary opponents go, while I'd support Warren and Biden (in the primary, at least) if they were to run, I honestly don't think either of them will. So, that leaves:

An avowed socialist (Sanders)
A governor who I admittedly didn't have huge qualms with the policies of, but who can't get his chosen successor to hold the seat after him in an EXTREMELY blue state (O'Malley)
A one term Senator who nearly lost to a toxic opponent who made every possible gaffe in '06 (Webb)
A former governor who was unpopular but was at least able to convince voters to elect Raimondo, my endorsement for that race, to succeed him. (Chafee)

The first is just....ugh. It's perfectly clear the third would probably lose the general. So, that leaves the 2nd and the fourth. I feel roughly equally about them, and it's "cooler" to support Chafee right now, so my support (in the democratic primary) goes to him for now.

[Brewer]

Exactly.

So at the end of the day Wulfric's fanatical opposition to Hillary was a product of him being sexist garbage. I'm actually somewhat surprised.

Believe what you like.

TLDR: She's too liberal for my tastes and for the moment there's still hope that republicans will nominate someone (fairly) moderate. But as I have said in the past: if the Republicans nominate Cruz, Carson, Walker, Santorum, Huckabee, etc., I will endorse and vote for Hillary.

You literally nodded along to a tweet implying that a) if you're a woman and your husband cheats, that's your fault because you couldn't "satisfy" him, and b) that a) represents such a failing on the woman's part that it literally disqualifies her from being a good President. Given this, and your fanatical latching onto the hot anti-Hillary sh**t of the month (Lincoln Chafee - seriously? Though you aren't alone in this regard, I'll grant you that), makes me doubt there's any circumstance you'd consider voting for Hillary short of the GOP nominating Zombie Hitler with Attila the Hun as running mate.

Seriously. You can oppose a female candidate without nodding along as human garbage like Trump rant about how it's the woman's fault when her husband cheats because SHE DINT SATISFY HER MANLY MAN LIKE A GOOD WIMMINZ SHULD. I usually think IceSpear is wrong 95% of the time when he says people's opposition to Hillary has roots in sexism, but let's just say I wouldn't be surprised if this was an occasion where that 5% managed to fire.

I will never vote for Ted Cruz/Mike Huckabee/Rick Santorum/Sarah Palin/Donald Trump in a general election, no matter how much you think I will, and I'd only do it in a primary to give a democrat I like an easy win (not ruling out Walker/Carson in every possible case, though it'd probably have to be them against a literal socialist, which HRC is thankfully not.). I've said I fear the far right more than the far left, and for good reason. The far-left would just spend us into horrible credit ratings in some bizarre attempt to make everyone equal. The far-right would do far worse, doing everything possible to lose jobs, then cutting as many entitlements as possible and throwing out the old, unlucky, and sick out onto the street to fight for food and health care.

As far as Hillary's primary opponents go, while I'd support Warren and Biden (in the primary, at least) if they were to run, I honestly don't think either of them will. So, that leaves:

An avowed socialist (Sanders)
A governor who I admittedly didn't have huge qualms with the policies of, but who can't get his chosen successor to hold the seat after him in an EXTREMELY blue state (O'Malley)
A one term Senator who nearly lost to a toxic opponent who made every possible gaffe in '06 (Webb)
A former governor who was unpopular but was at least able to convince voters to elect Raimondo, my endorsement for that race, to succeed him. (Chafee)

The first is just....ugh. It's perfectly clear the third would probably lose the general. So, that leaves the 2nd and the fourth. I feel roughly equally about them, and it's "cooler" to support Chafee right now, so my support (in the democratic primary) goes to him for now.

Are you ever planning on addressing the point phwezer was initially making? You can't simply brush off the fact that you responded to this moronic tweet with a simple "Exactly".

[Samantha]

If Donald Trump can't satisfy the two women who divorced him, what makes him think he can satisfy America?

[SteveRogers]

I will never vote for Ted Cruz/Mike Huckabee/Rick Santorum/Sarah Palin/Donald Trump in a general election, no matter how much you think I will, and I'd only do it in a primary to give a democrat I like an easy win (not ruling out Walker/Carson in every possible case, though it'd probably have to be them against a literal socialist, which HRC is thankfully not.). I've said I fear the far right more than the far left, and for good reason. The far-left would just spend us into horrible credit ratings in some bizarre attempt to make everyone equal. The far-right would do far worse, doing everything possible to lose jobs, then cutting as many entitlements as possible and throwing out the old, unlucky, and sick out onto the street to fight for food and health care.

As far as Hillary's primary opponents go, while I'd support Warren and Biden (in the primary, at least) if they were to run, I honestly don't think either of them will. So, that leaves:

An avowed socialist (Sanders)
A governor who I admittedly didn't have huge qualms with the policies of, but who can't get his chosen successor to hold the seat after him in an EXTREMELY blue state (O'Malley)
A one term Senator who nearly lost to a toxic opponent who made every possible gaffe in '06 (Webb)
A former governor who was unpopular but was at least able to convince voters to elect Raimondo, my endorsement for that race, to succeed him. (Chafee)

The first is just....ugh. It's perfectly clear the third would probably lose the general. So, that leaves the 2nd and the fourth. I feel roughly equally about them, and it's "cooler" to support Chafee right now, so my support (in the democratic primary) goes to him for now.

Not a single word of that explains or excuses this:

Exactly.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

All I am saying is that if Donald Trump is right that problems in Bill and Hillary's relationship can (partially) be blamed on Hillary, then that only adds to why she should not be president.

[Samantha]

All I am saying is that if Donald Trump is right that problems in Bill and Hillary's relationship can (partially) be blamed on Hillary, then that only adds to why she should not be president.

Oh boy. Now might be a good time to see this argument through to its logical conclusion and just stop.

[HAnnA MArin County]

Is this the GOP's new outreach to women strategy? I'm sure the suburban soccer moms will agree than anytime a man cheats, the woman is to blame for not satisfying his needs, whereas if a woman cheats, she's a tramp. The good ole double standard, and Republicans wonder why they cannot win female voters. To quote Todd Chrisley, Trump is all @$$ and no class.

[King]

All I am saying is that if Donald Trump is right that problems in Bill and Hillary's relationship can (partially) be blamed on Hillary, then that only adds to why she should not be president.

Bill and Hillary don't have any problems with their relationship.

[Flake]

All I am saying is that if Donald Trump is right that problems in Bill and Hillary's relationship can (partially) be blamed on Hillary, then that only adds to why she should not be president.

You're already in a hole, just stop digging.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

Ugh, I hate Trump.

[DrScholl]

Exactly.

This does not surprise me coming from you.

[RogueBeaver]

Ugh, I hate Trump.