1988 - California without Reagan's help...does Bush 41 hang on?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:46:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  1988 - California without Reagan's help...does Bush 41 hang on?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 1988 - California without Reagan's help...does Bush 41 hang on?  (Read 1461 times)
sg0508
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,058
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 19, 2015, 09:20:47 PM »

Or, as we've said over and over, was the 47 electoral votes Bush won there truly the "final gift from Reagan?"

It's so interesting how close CA was in so many races from '52-'88 and the Democrats only won it once during the LBJ landslide.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,074
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2015, 09:24:24 PM »

Bush Sr wouldn't be running that year at all without Reagan. There's little doubt in my mind Reagan is the only thing that won him that state, though.
Logged
TheElectoralBoobyPrize
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,528


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2015, 10:26:15 PM »

It had been 14 years since Reagan was governor of the state...could he have really made the difference?
Logged
Podgy the Bear
mollybecky
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,975


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2015, 07:53:10 PM »

Not sure if Reagan made the difference in California.  The Republicans in California were relatively unified at that point.  At that time, George Deukmejian had won reelection for governor in 1986, and Pete Wilson was reelected senator in 1988.    And then Wilson was elected governor in 1990. 

But the state was starting to trend left by then--and it really intensified in the years to follow.
Logged
CountyTy90
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2015, 08:49:05 PM »

Not sure if Reagan made the difference in California.  The Republicans in California were relatively unified at that point.  At that time, George Deukmejian had won reelection for governor in 1986, and Pete Wilson was reelected senator in 1988.    And then Wilson was elected governor in 1990. 

But the state was starting to trend left by then--and it really intensified in the years to follow.

I think he's the key to Bush winning. Sure, Reagan helped, but go and look at old campaign videos on C Span, Duke is behind Bush in every single one. Obviously Reagan couldn't be there all the time, but I really think Duke got the win for Bush. There were even rumors Bush wanted Duekmejian to be his Vice President.
Logged
Hydera
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,545


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2015, 09:07:23 PM »
« Edited: April 20, 2015, 09:12:52 PM by Hydera »

It had been 14 years since Reagan was governor of the state...could he have really made the difference?

The economy was still prospering in cali until the 1991 recession, Reagan was popular enough at that year to get HW to win it, albeit by a small margin only.

Or, as we've said over and over, was the 47 electoral votes Bush won there truly the "final gift from Reagan?"

It's so interesting how close CA was in so many races from '52-'88 and the Democrats only won it once during the LBJ landslide.

It only became a democrat stronghold post-1992 due to the hispanic vote, I think Reagan might of regretted signing the amnesty because he thought it would create a new voter base for the GOP among hispanics being thankful for the amnesty he signed, only for them to vote for the democrats.

Whats more interesting is how central valley+interior went from lean democrat to strong republican.
Logged
Starbucks Union Thug HokeyPuck
HockeyDude
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,376
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 21, 2015, 02:10:14 PM »

Could the fact that the California Republicans were still able to cast a vote of confidence in Reagan through his Vice President have kept the state from swinging two points into the Dukakis column?

Sure, I think so.  That's not that big of a stretch. 
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,200
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2015, 05:28:15 PM »

Nope, no Reagan = more turnout in the key counties such as Sacramento, Sierra, Plumas, Napa, and the rural Central Valley.

Sacramento and Napa would've joined the Bay Area, and the other counties would've been an effective Dakota thing.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,544
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2015, 08:24:55 PM »

Probably.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2015, 03:40:42 PM »

It had been 14 years since Reagan was governor of the state...could he have really made the difference?

The economy was still prospering in cali until the 1991 recession, Reagan was popular enough at that year to get HW to win it, albeit by a small margin only.

Or, as we've said over and over, was the 47 electoral votes Bush won there truly the "final gift from Reagan?"

It's so interesting how close CA was in so many races from '52-'88 and the Democrats only won it once during the LBJ landslide.

It only became a democrat stronghold post-1992 due to the hispanic vote, I think Reagan might of regretted signing the amnesty because he thought it would create a new voter base for the GOP among hispanics being thankful for the amnesty he signed, only for them to vote for the democrats.

Whats more interesting is how central valley+interior went from lean democrat to strong republican.


It wasnt just hispancs, it was a few things
1. The decline of the defense industry starting in 1989.
2. The recession of 1990-91 hit CA especially hard.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.