Which GOP candidate has the best shot of winning (assuming they run) and why? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 30, 2024, 01:57:36 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Election Archive

2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Which GOP candidate has the best shot of winning (assuming they run) and why? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Which Republican candidate declared or assumed to run has the best chance of getting the nomination and why?

#1 Bush		14 (38.9%)
#2 Rubio		4 (11.1%)
#3 Paul		6 (16.7%)
#4 Cruz		0 (0%)
#5 Carson		0 (0%)
#6 Christie		1 (2.8%)
#7 Walker		11 (30.6%)
#8 Huckabee		0 (0%)
#9 Santorum		0 (0%)
#10 Fiorina		0 (0%)
#11 Perry		0 (0%)
#12 Graham		0 (0%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 36

Author

Topic: Which GOP candidate has the best shot of winning (assuming they run) and why? (Read 1356 times)

SteveRogers
duncan298
YaBB God

Posts: 4,189

Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

Re: Which GOP candidate has the best shot of winning (assuming they run) and why?

« on: April 20, 2015, 02:01:57 PM »

Quote from: boshembechle on April 20, 2015, 01:52:27 AM

Rubio. I just can't see Bush winning with all the data showing how unpopular he is.

It matters VERY little who the big wig elites in the republican part like. When those country clubbers go to the polls, they are counted as one person, just like everyone else. The majority of republican primary voters look at bush and smell a rat. Rubio, on the other hand, strikes a good balance.

History shows this to be the opposite of true. Mitt Romney would like a word with you.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 15 queries.