Which decade had a higher standard of living, the 50s or the 90s?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:33:20 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Which decade had a higher standard of living, the 50s or the 90s?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which decade had a higher standard of living?
#1
1950s
 
#2
1990s
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Which decade had a higher standard of living, the 50s or the 90s?  (Read 1496 times)
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 23, 2015, 03:42:48 PM »

The 50s and 90s in some ways were very similar decades in the US. Peacetime booming economy with new conveniences coming into the mainstream. In the 50s we'd won WW2 and there was a sense of national optimism and in the 90s the Cold War was over and it was the "end of history." I always hear people say that the 50s in some ways was the height of prosperity yet I sometimes wonder if the 90s was actually better. If you look at the unemployment rate in the late 90s it was consistently lower then it was in the 50s. On he other hand the divide between rich and poor was much smaller in the 50s so I guess either would work.
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,074
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2015, 04:01:11 PM »

While wealth was a big chasm in the 1990s, the era was much fairer in conditions toward minorities, women, etc, etc, than the 1950s. Poverty was also much lower than in the 1990s, as the Great Society measure did not exist in the 1950s. The 1950s had three recessions, while the 1990s only had one.

I'm inclined to think the "height" of prosperity was probably 1962-1966. The "50's nostalgia" is a seemingly endless side-affect to Watergate and Vietnam.
Logged
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2015, 04:19:18 PM »

While wealth was a big chasm in the 1990s, the era was much fairer in conditions toward minorities, women, etc, etc, than the 1950s. Poverty was also much lower than in the 1990s, as the Great Society measure did not exist in the 1950s. The 1950s had three recessions, while the 1990s only had one.

I'm inclined to think the "height" of prosperity was probably 1962-1966. The "50's nostalgia" is a seemingly endless side-affect to Watergate and Vietnam.

Good points, there is a lot of revisionism regarding the 50s in the popular imagination.
Logged
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2015, 07:45:37 PM »

Still I'm actually surprised that so far it's 5-1 for the 90s.
Logged
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,772


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2015, 01:20:17 PM »

The 50s and 90s in some ways were very similar decades in the US. Peacetime booming economy with new conveniences coming into the mainstream. In the 50s we'd won WW2 and there was a sense of national optimism and in the 90s the Cold War was over and it was the "end of history." I always hear people say that the 50s in some ways was the height of prosperity yet I sometimes wonder if the 90s was actually better. If you look at the unemployment rate in the late 90s it was consistently lower then it was in the 50s. On he other hand the divide between rich and poor was much smaller in the 50s so I guess either would work.

1990s all day. 1996-2001 was the Golden period for America
Logged
Thunderbird is the word
Zen Lunatic
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,021


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2015, 10:00:50 PM »

Excellent points. In some ways then the late 90s for a brief period was possibly the best time in American history, in terms of having unemployment hovering around 4 percent during peacetime.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 26, 2015, 01:44:13 AM »

Excellent points. In some ways then the late 90s for a brief period was possibly the best time in American history, in terms of having unemployment hovering around 4 percent during peacetime.
Cheap credit also made it possible to mask the looming threat of stagnant wages by allowing a wide segment of the working and middle class to buy luxuries never before available to them, including new cars and larger homes, among other items.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,916


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 26, 2015, 02:42:49 AM »

Excellent points. In some ways then the late 90s for a brief period was possibly the best time in American history, in terms of having unemployment hovering around 4 percent during peacetime.
Cheap credit also made it possible to mask the looming threat of stagnant wages by allowing a wide segment of the working and middle class to buy luxuries never before available to them, including new cars and larger homes, among other items.

Wages were rising during the Clinton years, so credit wasn't needed. Between 1993 and 2000, $11,682 to $13,739 for the bottom 20%, $29,616 to $34,306 for the next 20%, and $49,644 to $57,129 for the next 20%, in constant 2013 dollars. The only period of rising wages from the 1970s to today which included all income quintiles and all races. It's strange that some Democrats today think this is a record that we should be running away from.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,743


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 26, 2015, 03:29:15 AM »

While wealth was a big chasm in the 1990s, the era was much fairer in conditions toward minorities, women, etc, etc, than the 1950s. Poverty was also much lower than in the 1990s, as the Great Society measure did not exist in the 1950s. The 1950s had three recessions, while the 1990s only had one.

I'm inclined to think the "height" of prosperity was probably 1962-1966. The "50's nostalgia" is a seemingly endless side-affect to Watergate and Vietnam.

http://www.realitybase.org/journal/2009/3/10/the-american-dream-died-in-february-1973.html
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.213 seconds with 15 queries.