MA: No Heart of Stone Act (Passed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:55:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  MA: No Heart of Stone Act (Passed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA: No Heart of Stone Act (Passed)  (Read 1880 times)
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« on: April 23, 2015, 10:27:48 PM »

What I see as the problem is this. We failed to separate the abortion discussion from the immigration portion. Laws should not cover multiple subjects in one bill when possible and this still fails that simple premise. I want to have an intelligent discussion over both issues but in order to do that, we need to seperate the two discussions into two different bills.



Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2015, 04:16:56 PM »

What I see as the problem is this. We failed to separate the abortion discussion from the immigration portion. Laws should not cover multiple subjects in one bill when possible and this still fails that simple premise. I want to have an intelligent discussion over both issues but in order to do that, we need to seperate the two discussions into two different bills.

They should have been two separate bills the first time. The original was passed in a mad rush the last week of the assembly session back last fall. Unfortunately, passing both parts as separate bills is not politically feasible, so we're effectively stuck with either the entire bill or only the immigration parts.

I'd like to point out that even with these abortion restrictions, the Mideast's abortion laws are far, far looser than they were three years ago when abortion was banned with exceptions for rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother.

We could quite easily take out the immigration parts and put it in a new bill, leaving the abortion part intact.

Which would lead to a better discussion.
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #2 on: May 06, 2015, 05:31:43 PM »

Aye
Logged
MyRescueKittehRocks
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,763
United States


« Reply #3 on: May 10, 2015, 10:50:50 AM »

Nay
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.