Federal Reserve Reform Repeal Act (Final vote)

[Cranberry]

I believed the bill to be reasonable when being debated, hence why I voted for this, and I see no reason to oppose it now.

[Cranberry]

Yes, I don't really see reasons to undo this, I supported the reform then and I still support it now.

[Cranberry]

Yes, Senator Hagrid summed up points against this act and for the reform perfectly. Let us reconsider the scenario, pre-reform and now:

Pre-Reform:
1. Person A (GM) sets circumstances -> 2. Person A (GM) creates policies to solve the problems created by himself just the minute before

Post-Reform:
2. Person A (GM) sets circumstances -> 2. Person B (SoIA) creates policies to answer them/solve problems/whatver

Frankly, I see no point whatsoever in the first version of the process outlined. It would be just like Hagrid said: playing with yourself.

[Cranberry]

Final vote seems sensible, yes.

[Cranberry]

Nay

[Cranberry]

As much as it offends my seperation of powers sensibilities from a philosophical point of view, (IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY/EXECUTIVE TYRANNY/DICTATOR BORE!!!!) from a game play aspect, one can hope that this will at the very least not cause any problems. Perhaps even generate the active interaction that frankly could have happened under the old system, but did not for frankly many of the same reasons nothing else happened (lacking a crazy pole as PPT).

Since this has been around since December, and it didn't cause any problems up until now, I doubt we will see problems arise now, half a year later.