Federal Reserve Reform Repeal Act (Final vote)

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Okay you're all wrong.


Monetary is not a god power (Sorry Windjammer). However it was at least a non-playable power or at least the Fed was a non-playable position (okay, Talleyrand gets a cookie for not being wrong).

Now let me me correct Cranberry and by extension Hagrid

Pre-reform: GM simulates a Fed policy and economic conditions  - Senate and President react with policies in response to those circumstances. This is where the action is anyway, legislation and therefore the best place to position that interaction in my view.

Post Reform: GM simulates economic conditions - Executive formulates Fed Policy and both Senate and PResident react with policy. In this case the executive is now responding with policies to a Fed decision it helped make, so either way you have that same problem, just in a different place.
 
There is still an interaction and someone will still be responding to themselves. The difference is where you want to place that interaction. The difference for me was thus over who controlled the Fed seeing as how both instances produced an interaction and I have long supported, a dynamic and powerful GM. Therefore I voted nay last time and will vote aye on this bill, and you can bet your boots there won't be any reluctance about that partner.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Looks like we are getting about time for a vote. Considering this is a repeal bill, beyond the statements for or against, there probably won't be much input, though obviously this is not the only bill that has been languishing.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

AYE

This is going to be a rather weird vote result.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Whiggery shall rise again Mr. Speaker.

An Amercian referencing an 17th century English political movement, in a pathetic faux Southern accent, to a modern French socialist. I hope to god someone understands it. And this line itself is a steal from a 1971 English historical drama.

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

As much as it offends my seperation of powers sensibilities from a philosophical point of view, (IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY/EXECUTIVE TYRANNY/DICTATOR BORE!!!!) from a game play aspect, one can hope that this will at the very least not cause any problems. Perhaps even generate the active interaction that frankly could have happened under the old system, but did not for frankly many of the same reasons nothing else happened (lacking a crazy pole as PPT).

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

As much as it offends my seperation of powers sensibilities from a philosophical point of view, (IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY/EXECUTIVE TYRANNY/DICTATOR BORE!!!!) from a game play aspect, one can hope that this will at the very least not cause any problems. Perhaps even generate the active interaction that frankly could have happened under the old system, but did not for frankly many of the same reasons nothing else happened (lacking a crazy pole as PPT).

Since this has been around since December, and it didn't cause any problems up until now, I doubt we will see problems arise now, half a year later.

Not quite half a year to be exact. Yes, in that time no problems have come about, but also none of the promised interaction, at least nothing major in that regard obviously.