Cooperatives Administration Act of 2015 (Failed) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:02:26 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Cooperatives Administration Act of 2015 (Failed) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Cooperatives Administration Act of 2015 (Failed)  (Read 2484 times)
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« on: April 24, 2015, 12:11:00 PM »

I am more inclined to support Senator Hagrid's side on the issue here. While certainly cooperatives are worth supporting, he does have a point in that they will, on the short or long term, have to prove themselves by themselves.

Section 2.1 is for me, same as for Senator Hagrid, quite unworkable, simply because there won't be enough cooperatives to begin with.
Section 2.2 will be a rather large cost, I could see myself support paying a share (30%?) of the cost, if you want that.
I don't see where people would derive any capital gain from those bonds as outlined in Section 2.3, and I doubt that many people will suddenly buy such bonds without any revenue in sight.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2015, 04:26:50 AM »

I do as well.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2015, 09:07:27 AM »

AYE
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #3 on: April 28, 2015, 12:03:59 PM »

What are we spending on the Small Business Administration? I guess a similar figure should suffice?
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2015, 12:32:10 PM »

Nix's argumentation makes, as always, perfect sense. I guess I will have to refrain my judgement here on for the time being, would like to see TNF's answer however.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2015, 12:23:42 PM »

Senator Polnut sums up my opinion pretty well and in a nutshell. (This rhymed, yay! Wink)
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2015, 05:08:08 AM »

'I don't believe it's our role to promote a particular form of business organization'

Except that you do, because not promoting co-ops means spending federal dollars on contracts with non-cooperative enterprises.

The government is not promoting anything by paying for the goods and services it needs to operate. Contracts should go to companies who can do good work at a reasonably competitive price. If cooperatives cannot deliver on those fronts, then there's a problem inherent to their business model. I'm inclined to believe they can indeed compete on their own.

And since we don't seem to be giving too much help to small business either, I don't see why we should help cooperatives instead.

Exactly. Not giving one thing extra-bonus doesn't mean giving the extra-bonus to its competitors. There is no need for "if you're not for us you're against us" mentality.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2015, 09:41:07 AM »

NAY

We'd be passing something with $TBD in it.

And it's even in bold...

NAY
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


« Reply #8 on: May 23, 2015, 04:47:42 AM »

Lief didn't vote, but Blair did.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.