1916 Election (The Hearse at Monticello)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 06:10:16 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  1916 Election (The Hearse at Monticello)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: For President and Vice President
#1
Congresswoman Jeanette Rankin (P-MT)/ Congressman Upton Sinclair (P-CA)
 
#2
Fmr. Congressman Charles W. Fairbanks (A-IN)/ Senator Hiram Johnson (A-CA)
 
#3
Governor George E. Chamberlain (D-OR)/ Congressman James M. Cox (D-OH)
 
#4
Journalist Allan Benson (S-NY)/ Mr. George R. Kirkpatrick (S-NJ)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: 1916 Election (The Hearse at Monticello)  (Read 1075 times)
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 24, 2015, 06:30:37 PM »

Though many had expected Vice President Oscar Underwood to receive the Populist nomination, the People's National Convention in Helena instead nominated dark horse candidate Jeannette Rankin. A fervent pacifist and a two-term Congresswoman from Montana, Rankin became the first female candidate for the presidency since Elizabeth Cady Stanton, running on a platform calling for continued vigilance against the Trusts and un-shaking neutrality in Europe's "Great War".

Not all within the Populist Party are at ease with Rankin's candidacy. Rankin's strong pacifism and her short time in national office have led some to believe that she would be inept as a war leader should the United States be drawn into the conflict. This has provided ready fodder for Rankin's American and Democratic foes, both of whom favor "preparedness": a kind of armed neutrality that balances the need for military defense with a reluctance to become embroiled in Europe's scuffles. Of these, Governor George Chamberlain of Oregon, the Democratic nominee, has been the most outspoken in favor of military preparation, though he maintains that he will not seek to initiate a conflict unless the US is attacked first.

The American Party nominee, meanwhile, is former Congressman Charles Fairbanks, the figurehead of conservative politicians within the party. In an attempt to reunite the progressive and conservative factions after the divisive election of 1912, Fairbanks has chosen Senator Hiram Johnson as his running mate. Like Chamberlain, Fairbanks favors military preparedness in the event of a war; in terms of domestic policy, he has called for a scaling back of the Debs reforms, which he claims are responsible for the ongoing economic depression.

Then there is Socialist Allan Benson, whose third party run has given rise to fears of vote-splitting within the Populist Party. Far to the left of Debs and Underwood, Benson has called for the complete deconstruction of the capitalist economy and absolute neutrality in the Great War. Calling the president a puppet of the capitalists, he has scorned progressive reform and is attempting instead to unite the nation's workers behind his banner.

This will be close. Vote!
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,064
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2015, 06:34:06 PM »

Rankin/Sinclair.
Logged
TDAS04
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,538
Bhutan


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2015, 06:35:38 PM »

Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,193
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2015, 06:40:04 PM »

For the failure to nominate Underwood...I cast my vote to Chamberlain
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,320
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2015, 08:11:02 PM »

Fairbanks (Anybody but Rankin)
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2015, 08:20:20 PM »

rankin/sinclair (normal)
Logged
Illuminati Blood Drinker
phwezer
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,528
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.42, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 24, 2015, 08:20:41 PM »

Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,064
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 24, 2015, 08:21:13 PM »

Fairbanks (Anybody but Rankin)

Why? Don't you want to avoid WWI?
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2015, 10:51:12 PM »

Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,064
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 24, 2015, 10:59:56 PM »

Come on, people, she'll really keep us out of war. That's what matters most.
Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2015, 02:32:29 AM »

So is Fairbanks the new Cleveland? I hope not.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,320
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2015, 08:13:16 AM »


Someone who wouldn't vote to declare war on Japan after Pearl Harbor has no business being President, period.  If Rankin wouldn't go to war even then, surely there will be other times where her rabid isolationism would lead to similarly insane decisions if she ever became President.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2015, 08:59:17 AM »

Fairbanks (Anybody but Rankin)
Logged
SWE
SomebodyWhoExists
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,309
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2015, 09:03:56 AM »


Someone who wouldn't vote to declare war on Japan after Pearl Harbor has no business being President, period.  If Rankin wouldn't go to war even then, surely there will be other times where her rabid isolationism would lead to similarly insane decisions if she ever became President.
It's a good thing this election is being held a few decades before Pearl Harbor, then

And surely the most insane decisions Rankin could be responsible would not be 'Joining WWI' - level insane
Logged
Kaine for Senate '18
benconstine
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,329
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2015, 12:47:04 PM »

Chamberlain
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,112
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 25, 2015, 09:13:37 PM »

Fairbanks will die in 1918 and make Hiram Johnson president, and he was no interventionist himself.
Logged
Chancellor Tanterterg
Mr. X
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,320
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 26, 2015, 12:05:04 PM »


Someone who wouldn't vote to declare war on Japan after Pearl Harbor has no business being President, period.  If Rankin wouldn't go to war even then, surely there will be other times where her rabid isolationism would lead to similarly insane decisions if she ever became President.
It's a good thing this election is being held a few decades before Pearl Harbor, then

And surely the most insane decisions Rankin could be responsible would not be 'Joining WWI' - level insane

Entering World War I wasn't an insane decision, although whether it was the right one is debatable (I'd argue the Zimmerman telegram was a sufficient reason).  God knows what sort of crises would be created by Rankin's insane arch-isolationism.
Logged
Dr. Cynic
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,434
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.11, S: -6.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 26, 2015, 12:42:06 PM »


Someone who wouldn't vote to declare war on Japan after Pearl Harbor has no business being President, period.  If Rankin wouldn't go to war even then, surely there will be other times where her rabid isolationism would lead to similarly insane decisions if she ever became President.
It's a good thing this election is being held a few decades before Pearl Harbor, then

And surely the most insane decisions Rankin could be responsible would not be 'Joining WWI' - level insane

Entering World War I wasn't an insane decision, although whether it was the right one is debatable (I'd argue the Zimmerman telegram was a sufficient reason).  God knows what sort of crises would be created by Rankin's insane arch-isolationism.

I agree with this. The Zimmerman telegram did represent a threat to the United States' security. Just to ignore it with a arch-isolationist position would be crazy. This country had to be on some sort of footing, even if entering the war was a mistake. I think it was a great mistake to choose Rankin over Underwood, who would have been a good President.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 26, 2015, 09:17:30 PM »

1916 Presidential Election

Fmr. Congressman Charles W. Fairbanks (American-Indiana)/ Senator Hiram Johnson (American-California): 333 Electoral Votes; 42.9% popular votes
Congresswoman Jeanette Rankin (People's-Montana)/ Congressman Upton Sinclair (People's-California): 127 Electoral Votes; 31.4% popular votes
Governor George Chamberlain (Democratic-Oregon)/ Congressman James M. Cox (Democratic-Ohio): 71 Electoral Votes; 20.0% popular votes
Journalist Allan Benson (Socialist-New York)/ Mr. George R. Kirkpatrick (Socialist-New Jersey): 0 Electoral Votes; 5.7% popular votes

A slumbering economy, concerns that Rankin's pacifism would make the United States easy pickings for the "German Menace", and the defection of Underwood supporters to the opposition all spelled trouble for the Populist ticket in 1916. With the American Party once again united after the calamitous election of 1912, Charles W. Fairbanks was able to capitalize on public concern for national security to win a smashing victory in both the electoral college and the popular vote. While the Democrats performed far better than they had four years earlier, Allan Benson's Socialist ticket would fail to catch on, with most laborers remaining loyal to the Populists.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 13 queries.