Snyder set to announce soon; UPDATE: actually, he's out (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 03:59:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Snyder set to announce soon; UPDATE: actually, he's out (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Snyder set to announce soon; UPDATE: actually, he's out  (Read 4213 times)
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« on: April 25, 2015, 01:44:42 PM »

Deadlocked convention, here we come!
Keep Dreaming
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2015, 01:54:28 PM »

We have now reached the point where 20 (non-completely unknown joke) candidates are projected to run for the Republican nomination. This shall be glorious.
To be fair only half will ever be allowed on a debate stage
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2015, 02:13:06 PM »

We have now reached the point where 20 (non-completely unknown joke) candidates are projected to run for the Republican nomination. This shall be glorious.
To be fair only half will ever be allowed on a debate stage

They'd probably ignore Pataki, Gilmore, Bolton, and Ehrlich, but it'd be hard to not see invitations for others. Maybe they could decline Santorum and Trump, but the rest would probably be invited.
Graham and Fiorina aren't getting on either
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2015, 02:14:26 PM »

That also assumes every single candidate that is being discussed will enter the race which is certainly not true
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2015, 02:16:35 PM »

We have now reached the point where 20 (non-completely unknown joke) candidates are projected to run for the Republican nomination. This shall be glorious.
To be fair only half will ever be allowed on a debate stage

They'd probably ignore Pataki, Gilmore, Bolton, and Ehrlich, but it'd be hard to not see invitations for others. Maybe they could decline Santorum and Trump, but the rest would probably be invited.
Graham and Fiorina aren't getting on either
Why not?
you usually need at least 3% in the polls to get into the debates
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2015, 02:19:10 PM »

But... with a minimum of 3% in the polls, are we still looking at 10+ candidates in the debates?
actually more like 8-10 which is smaller than the democratic debates in 2008
Logged
Pandaguineapig
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,608
United States


« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2015, 02:26:30 PM »

That also assumes every single candidate that is being discussed will enter the race which is certainly not true

Who do you not see running? I think everyone is in.
Has that ever happened? remember in 2012 when Daniels, Barbour, Jindal, Demint, Huckabee, and Christie were supposed to get in but didn't. Every cycle has candidates that explore running but eventually bail
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.