What exactly will Republicans run on? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:55:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What exactly will Republicans run on? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: What exactly will Republicans run on?  (Read 3154 times)
heatmaster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,244
Ireland, Republic of


« on: April 26, 2015, 05:49:33 AM »

Clinton having no baggage? Er....what planet are you living on? Republicans will run on "do you want more of this?" & point to Obama's foreign policy, his socialist agenda, Clinton represents more of the same & then you have her "record" as Secretary of State, that's a net negative by now...linkage to the Clinton Foundation foreign money donations & other iffy activities....emailgate...so instead of "don't stop thinking about tomorrow", it will be more about singing the tune "yesterday" or "money, money, money it's a rich man's world"😊😁
Logged
heatmaster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,244
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #1 on: April 27, 2015, 02:21:05 AM »

You Dems r Hillary-ious😀 besides Whitewater, Vince Foster...what about Emailgate? Influence peddling...quid pro quo over Haiti,  Uranium One being sold to Russia after sweetheart deal with Kazakhstan, Digicell, Peter Giustra, Bill's speaking fees jumping to $500-750K the minute Hillary becomes Secretary of State...what about Tony Rodham (Hillary's brother getting a job on board of a mining company, Benghazi...no wonder Hillary deleted her emails...wonder why....oh yeah I know, "to protect her privacy" Give me a break....yeah right folks! & I believe in the tooth fairy!😂😃😁 really? Why don't all of you Clintonista's get your head out of the sand & read Peter Schweitzer's book,  "Clinton Ca$h", he went to the Washington Post,  New York Times, CBS & even FOX & they gave all the all clear. But just read the book & see if you like the optics,  when 51% of potential voters say Hillary isn't trustworthy,  I wonder why.
Logged
heatmaster
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,244
Ireland, Republic of


« Reply #2 on: April 27, 2015, 09:54:07 AM »

Good point King, the record speaks for itself. We are not the United States of America as Obama once advocated. We as a party should speak about how divided this country is. Diversity shouldn't be a political buzz word, but a reality. The campaign should be less of what is wrong & what can be made right and what will be right. If Hillary and Obama want to campaign on fear and sowing division, let them be seen doing such. If Rubio or Bush wins the nod, then the debate should and must be elevated,  so instead of race or sex being thrown around, distinctions should be made on what was offered & promised and what was delivered and not on those grounds Democrats love to campaign on.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 13 queries.