Do you realize that some people may think something is a "civil right" but another person may not think so? Or, perhaps that person may support the specific policy, but not believe its a civil right.
He still doesn't deserve to be outed for "retaliation." People asked for examples of why people say Gay Gestapo like the OP in the Federalist Article, why people say they feel intimidated and hurt as I have, these are the answers to those questions. Any dissent is not permitted, apparently. This man did not deserve to have his privacy violated by this ... person.
That's a valid opinion that I can agree with, but it doesn't help when you muddy it up with suggestions that people who don't believe they deserve equal rights, opportunities, or whatever you would like to call them, make up a sizable portion of the gay community.