Well I am awake and sober, and I am kind of bored and it is a Saturday. With that said, and my moderate hero attitude to respectfully address even scientific racists, I must begin this long journey to educate and enlighten poor misguided souls.
I would beg the forgiveness of the rest of the forum.
From personal experience bro let me tell you that posting drunk isn't always a bad idea. However, if you are drunk you should never preface it on a post like this. Claiming you are drunk isn't going to do jack sh
it to help your cause bro. If anything on a forum of intellectual Puritan prude bloods it's going to make you look like a savage ingrate who blames his inner securities and problems on his tendency to drink.
At least you have the decency to apologize instead of saying "not to sound racist here.. . . . . BUT!" Though I do have to wonder exactly what purpose it serves for you to say you will put this "frankly". May I ask what "non-frankly" would look like? "Non-whites just don't understand!"?
Largely because Western people have traditionally been on the winning side of history. It is very easy to claim to be the most enlightened people in history when your people have had the fortune of being winners instead of losers. Of course, you leave out a lot of things, like how the Middle Eastern world was a thriving civilization that was a leader in practically all fields of learning, medical, and technological advances before they had the misfortune of being wiped out by the Mongol wave. Also, it is unfair to base how East Asians would have treated black people compared to whites when the latter have generally had much more experience with blacks than the former. Asians generally enslaved other Asians while whitey enslaved Native Americans, Celticy people, Slavs, blacks, and even their own lower classes. In fact, the mass enslavement that people of all races committed within their own race/ethnic groups is one of the untold stories of history.
The Intellectual Dishonesty here is strong.
Yes because again they ran into a bit of bad luck. It has nothing to do with any inherent "goodness" or "superiority" of white civilization. Ironically enough, it was because of bad luck the Europeans became triumphant as they did, as the Black Death wiped out enough upper class and lower class people to facilitate the conditions necessary to expand the infant artisan and merchant classes, the main drivers of said advancement.
Because again, they happened to be the first to develop the "way of doing things". Point largely being that Western Civilization is in such a position of privilege that they don't have to deal with the problems that arise out of living in a third world country.
And again you are basing this off of what has actually happened. In the scenarios you put into this little paragraph you seemed to have ignored the initial butterflies. I won't address blacks conquering Europe because your point about the technologically superior power immediately addresses that question in a surprisingly good way, which is a very stark contrast to the rest of your drunken rant. However, your points about black civil disobedience in China or India seems to presume such reactions against the disobedience based off of what has transpired in this reality. We don't have the experience of living in a reality where there was a Chinese or Indian society that relied heavily on a black slave economy to come to that kind of conclusion that you reached in the bolded. Peoples' views are drive by experience, a point that you do lightly agree with but seem to want to keep de-emphasized because it hurts your points about the poor white man and his abused legacy at the hands of bitter minority college age pseudo-intellectuals.
The problem seems to be though that while do you acknowledge that white people largely claimed the mantle of enlightenment due to luck more than anything, you seem to assume that Chinese and Indians would have made the KKK look like bleedingheart anti-racist socialists due to how they view blacks in the recent world history (circa 1500-presents) where white culture and white society was dominant and ruled the world on and off. Which is not to completely ignore that said histories (Indian and Chinese) had their own liberal amounts of genocides and mass rapes and other sh
it, some of which occurred well before whitey showed up often against people of the same ethnicity. However, that goes back to your own point about how societies in a position of dominance generally are in a position to abuse the less off to strengthen their own position. Honestly, you were doing well here until you started making assumptions about what would happen in Alternate Reality X, then you just went downhill into a sewage ditch and got AIDSbola.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . wow.
You see, this is why people don't like you Cory. I mean damn it man, you aren't making this easy on me! You, like many other people, seem to be on this assumption that people not like you are ungrateful morons who are hell bent on being pissed off and not liking whitey. That could really be further from the truth, as at least I really do want to like you pal. I mean I consider myself to be a very cordial friendly person who wants to treat everyone with respect and decency and at least consider their opinions even if I consider said opinion to be extremely controversial (okay, history as it actually happened is something I am very passionate about defending, but other than that personal political views I try to be lenient on).
However, when you say horsesh
it like this? Man dude, why? Why do you make it so f
ucking easy for people on this website to despise you man? I would have thought that someone who has been on here since at least 2013 would have taken a hint by now that generally making not at all subtly racist eugenics laden posts would not be a good thing. I would have also thought that with all the education in the world that you have had you would have at least been a decent enough person to eventually regret your earlier racial views. So far, sadly, this has not happened. As much as I have wanted it to be you are still very much a resentful white racist who seems to be struggling at times between what he has observed and read from history and his own inner feelings of insecurity with people of other races. Really, there is not much separating you from ChairmanSanchez, except that he has at least in the past acknowledged that he has (like myself and maybe a few others) struggled with anti-black racism.
It is easy for one to condemn the resentment and bitterness of non-whites and poors when one is not one themselves. You don't understand how it feels to be black in America. Shi
t man I don't understand what it's like to be black in America! Nor will I ever be able to understand it, no matter how much history I know. That is the fallacy that millions of white Americans make every year when they have reactions like yours to non-white intellectuals who point out the inequalities of society. Do I genuinely believe that calling entire population demographics "a problem" is racist as hell? You damn right I do. However, that doesn't give me license to badmouth a woman and her demographic group as embittered ungrateful rubes especially when I have no idea what it is like to be a non-white female.
Yes you did. And if there is any justice in this world one day you will look back on this post and feel inmeasurable shame. I pray to Aqua Buddha that day is today.
-Mechaman
