Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 01, 2015, 07:19:57 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Election 2016 predictions are now open!.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: Mr. Morden)
| | |-+  Mississippi/Alabama
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print
Author Topic: Mississippi/Alabama  (Read 5467 times)
MaC
Milk_and_cereal
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9811


View Profile
« on: May 01, 2005, 10:22:13 pm »
Ignore

will these two states ever vote for separate candidates?  The was one instance in the 1840s, but that was a long long time ago. 
Logged

Faster than a legally fired bullet.
More powerful than railroaded legislation.
Able to leap giant bureaucracy in a single bound.

It's an anarchist.  It's a free marketer.

It's... It's...        Super Libertarian
Erc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4680
Slovenia


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 01, 2005, 10:54:27 pm »
Ignore

Very nearly happened in 1976...

But, barring a ridiculous landslide, a drastic realignment, or some strange third party candidacy, it ain't happening anytime soon.
Logged
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58767
India


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2005, 05:49:50 am »
Ignore

Happened in 1960...well, sort of.
Logged

If I'm shown as having been active here recently it's either because I've been using the gallery, because I've been using the search engine looking up something from way back, or because I've been reading the most excellent UK by-elections thread again.
True Democrat
true democrat
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7398
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.10, S: -2.87

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2005, 05:56:47 am »
Ignore

Happened in 1960...well, sort of.

The people voted for the different candidates, but the electors mostly voted for the same candidates.
Logged

Michael Bloomberg for President.



Lol Winfield.  This quote is from a thread entitled "what do the following proceed to do if they are not nominated?"
Romney - President of Harvard
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29926
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2005, 05:22:15 pm »
Ignore

I doubt this will ever happen again. However, if the black turnout varied between the states, it's possible.
Logged

n/c
patrick1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7879


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2005, 05:26:36 pm »
Ignore

It could happen.  Mississippi is only 61% or so white while Bama is 71%- pretty big difference.
Logged
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34413


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2005, 05:33:26 pm »
Ignore

Mississippi will probably become a Democratic state around 2040.
Logged

Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29926
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2005, 05:37:05 pm »
Ignore

Mississippi will probably become a Democratic state around 2040.

Why do you say that?
Logged

n/c
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27873


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2005, 06:35:14 pm »
Ignore

Mississippi will probably become a Democratic state around 2040.

Why do you say that?

Because he's jfern.
Logged
patrick1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7879


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2005, 06:44:58 pm »
Ignore

Mississippi will probably become a Democratic state around 2040.

Why do you say that?

Because he's jfern.

Demographic trends give jfern some credence on this one.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27873


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2005, 06:47:10 pm »
Ignore

Mississippi will probably become a Democratic state around 2040.

Why do you say that?

Because he's jfern.

Demographic trends give jfern some credence on this one.

Projecting 30 years into the future in politics based on demographic trends is nearly impossible, imo.  Smiley
Logged
patrick1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7879


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2005, 06:55:54 pm »
Ignore

Very true but it is not that implausible. There are going to be a lot less white people around in 35 years and I don't see that many blacks becoming Republican- who knows though.  I'm sure many people foresaw the solid south switching their loyalties either,.
Logged
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17516


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2005, 07:45:42 pm »
Ignore

The problem with MS is it doesn't follow national demographic trends. 30 years ago blacks were an even bigger percentage of the state population that they are now. Both blacks and whites are fleeing the state like bees from a shaken hive.
Logged

A New Chapter

"I feel like Paulette Revere the recession is coming, the recession is coming! - Hillary Clinton, April 3, 2008
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58767
India


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2005, 08:33:10 am »
Ignore

Black percentage in Mississippi has been falling for decades if I'm not mistaken.
Logged

If I'm shown as having been active here recently it's either because I've been using the gallery, because I've been using the search engine looking up something from way back, or because I've been reading the most excellent UK by-elections thread again.
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34413


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: May 04, 2005, 01:29:01 pm »
Ignore

Kerry won the 18-29 group in MS 63-37.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5297171/
Logged

phk
phknrocket1k
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12952


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: May 04, 2005, 01:39:16 pm »
Ignore

Mississippi could trend Democrat if these trends hold up, but will they? Probably not.
Logged

Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon
htmldon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8896
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.03, S: -2.26

View Profile
« Reply #16 on: May 04, 2005, 09:02:07 pm »
Ignore

DeSoto county is getting a significant influx of conservative voters from Memphis... though I expect those to be eventually be followed by blacks.
Logged
jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7018
View Profile
« Reply #17 on: May 04, 2005, 09:07:34 pm »
Ignore

The South isn't going to swing in the current state of the Democratic Party.  They'll move away from us as fast as they add numbers to Democratic totals.  A populist candidate could easily change that.
Logged
Akno21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9135
View Profile
« Reply #18 on: May 04, 2005, 10:02:59 pm »
Ignore

The South isn't going to swing in the current state of the Democratic Party. They'll move away from us as fast as they add numbers to Democratic totals. A populist candidate could easily change that.

I never thought of the south as being especially economically liberal. How economically liberal, if you were to assign a PC score, would you give the south as a whole?
Logged

jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7018
View Profile
« Reply #19 on: May 04, 2005, 10:09:10 pm »
Ignore

The South isn't going to swing in the current state of the Democratic Party. They'll move away from us as fast as they add numbers to Democratic totals. A populist candidate could easily change that.

I never thought of the south as being especially economically liberal. How economically liberal, if you were to assign a PC score, would you give the south as a whole?
If you made the south the confederacy+ Missouri, Kentucky, and West Virginia, I'd say -.5.  It would be close.  Yet, I'd say the social score would be about +3.  When I say populist, I don't mean nessicarily just economically left, socially right, yet anti-elistist, pro-family values, and common-sense.
Logged
Sam Spade
SamSpade
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27873


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: May 04, 2005, 10:12:22 pm »
Ignore

You've also got to make a big difference between rural areas and suburbs.

The Birmingham suburbs are very different than, say, rural Mississippi.
Logged
Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 59094
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2005, 05:26:13 am »
Ignore

You've also got to make a big difference between rural areas and suburbs.

Very, very true. A good measure of an areas politics is the sort of people it elects to the State Legislature... and there's a huge difference between the sort of people the rural South likes to elect and the sort the sunbelty suburbs like to elect
Logged

'If pop music is going to be used to destroy our established institutions, then it must be destroyed first.'

Marcus Lipton MP
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2005, 08:52:50 am »
Ignore

The South is not populist. It is conservative.
Logged
Akno21
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9135
View Profile
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2005, 02:37:07 pm »
Ignore

The South isn't going to swing in the current state of the Democratic Party. They'll move away from us as fast as they add numbers to Democratic totals. A populist candidate could easily change that.

I never thought of the south as being especially economically liberal. How economically liberal, if you were to assign a PC score, would you give the south as a whole?
If you made the south the confederacy+ Missouri, Kentucky, and West Virginia, I'd say -.5. It would be close. Yet, I'd say the social score would be about +3. When I say populist, I don't mean nessicarily just economically left, socially right, yet anti-elistist, pro-family values, and common-sense.

West Virginia certainly, but would you really win if you went to Kentucky and promised bigger government?
Logged

jokerman
Cosmo Kramer
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7018
View Profile
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2005, 03:04:08 pm »
Ignore

The South isn't going to swing in the current state of the Democratic Party. They'll move away from us as fast as they add numbers to Democratic totals. A populist candidate could easily change that.

I never thought of the south as being especially economically liberal. How economically liberal, if you were to assign a PC score, would you give the south as a whole?
If you made the south the confederacy+ Missouri, Kentucky, and West Virginia, I'd say -.5. It would be close. Yet, I'd say the social score would be about +3. When I say populist, I don't mean nessicarily just economically left, socially right, yet anti-elistist, pro-family values, and common-sense.

West Virginia certainly, but would you really win if you went to Kentucky and promised bigger government?
Economic Populism isn't nessicarily bigger government. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines