Wyoming passses law that criminalizes collection of enviromental data (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:27:01 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Wyoming passses law that criminalizes collection of enviromental data (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wyoming passses law that criminalizes collection of enviromental data  (Read 4547 times)
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« on: May 13, 2015, 01:22:24 PM »

No, you're making a false equivalence. This is obviously a totally different situation done in an attempt to cover up a public health concern.

How do you think the federal government seizes land? Are you really so myopic that you've already forgotten about the Cliven Bundy affair?

If you don't understand the ecological politics of the Mountain West, don't comment.

Seizing land? Bundy was the one trying to seize land, not the Feds.  The idea that renters have a right to seize property they've been renting is absolutely abhorrent to anyone who cares about the rule of law.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,144
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2015, 10:25:42 PM »

Seizing land? Bundy was the one trying to seize land, not the Feds.  The idea that renters have a right to seize property they've been renting is absolutely abhorrent to anyone who cares about the rule of law.

I see you're still trying to make sense of mountain west eco warfare. Spend more time out that way. You'll stop trying.

I'm quite aware that out west so called "independent" people still cling to the former policy of the Feds subsidizing them with below market rate access to land and water.  At the very least, if Bundy was going to claim that nothing above county government exists and that the land was his, he should have paid property taxes to the county on the Federal land he's been squatting on for two decades. Of course, that would likely have been considerably more expensive than the grazing fees he's refused to pay as part of his "right to squat".
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 12 queries.