National Assembly of Wales Elections 2016 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 08:08:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  National Assembly of Wales Elections 2016 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: National Assembly of Wales Elections 2016  (Read 13527 times)
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« on: May 12, 2015, 01:22:05 PM »

I hope UKIP don't get any seats, but it looks inevitable.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2015, 10:15:13 AM »

YouGov have a poll out: Labour 39, Con 23, Plaid 18, UKIP 13, LDem 6, Greens 2. Regional list figures (which are always dodgy) are Labour 34, Con 24, Plaid 18, UKIP 14, LDem 5, Greens 4.
They may be dodgy as people, being polled, interpret it as their second preference vote - rather than their regional vote.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2015, 12:52:11 PM »

Huw Irranca-Davies has been selected as the Labour candidate for Ogmore. He currently represents the same constituency at Westminster.

Double-Jobbing is forbidden, yes?
The Wales Act 2014 prevents it from happening after the 2016 election.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2016, 03:29:24 PM »

YouGov have quietly released an opinion poll for this election:

Constituency
Lab 37% (±0)
Con 27% (±0)
UKIP 18% (+1)
Plaid 13% (+1)
Lib 4% (±0)
Oth 2% (-1)

List
Lab 34% (-1)
Con 22% (-1)
Plaid 19% (-1)
UKIP 18% (+3)
Lib 5% (±0)
Oth 2% (-1)

EU Referendum
Remain 37% (-3)
Leave 45% (+3)
WNV 3% (-2)
DK 16% (+2)
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2016, 12:56:46 PM »

YouGov have such an obvious house effect for UKIP at present (which has emerged quite randomly over the past six months? Bizarre) that it would be nice to see what other companies made of things, except probably it wouldn't as pretty much all Welsh polling since there has been such a thing has been terrible.
Agreed. I would take it as an indication of direction though, although I would completely ignore the party list figures - as a sizeable minority think the poll is asking for a second preference.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2016, 01:42:26 PM »

Holy Christ, Plaid's manifesto is 193 pages long :0

I assume that must mean they've burried some cracking stuff in there that activists really wanted but would be laughed at by the media in general.

It's only 96 pages  - unless you want to read it in English and Welsh. Wink Every other major party has split their manifesto into English and Welsh sections - where as Plaid's is Welsh one pages, then English the next, then Welsh, etc.

Labour - 24 pages
Greens - 25 pages
Conservatives - 30 pages
UKIP - 48 pages
Plaid - 96 pages
Lib Dems - 104 pages
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2016, 01:46:14 PM »

YouGov (19-22 Apr)Sad
Lab 33/29 (-2/-2 on 7-11 Apr poll)
PC 21/22 (NC/+2)
Con 19/19 (NC/-1)
UKIP 15/15 (-2/-1)
Lib 8/8 (+2/+3)
Grn -/4 (-/NC)

My seat projection puts seats at:
Lab 22 (-8)
PC 15 (+4)
Con 11 (-3)
UKIP 8 (+8)
Lib 4 (-1)
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2016, 01:57:38 PM »

Pretty clear by this point that all movement in the polls for about a year has been statistical noise one way or the other and that, probably, we're better off ignoring them as individual efforts.
The problem is that we've only got YouGov polling in Wales. Unlike Scotland, we can't have an average of different pollster to bring us closer to the actual position.

You're right to mention not giving much attention to single polls. YouGov were quite a bit out last time, as well (constituency below):

Labour - 5% overestimated
Conservatives - 5% underestimated
Plaid - 2% underestimated
Lib Dem - 1% underestimated
Others - 3% overestimated
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2016, 04:36:40 PM »

ITV Wales Exit Poll:
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2016, 04:59:46 PM »

Yeah that sounds about as expected. UKIP winning list seats really fycks over the LibDems, btw.
It does - as there are only four list seats in each region.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2016, 06:29:07 PM »

Scottish Tories polled higher percentages than their Welsh cousins on both constituency and list ballots.
It's an interesting observation - when was the last time that happened?

That being said however... Wink

Right Wing (Mainstream) Parties
Scotland:
Con 22.0/22.9
UKIP 0.0/2.0
Total 22.0/24.9

Wales:
Con 21.1/18.8
UKIP 12.5/13.0
Total 33.6/31.8
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #11 on: May 11, 2016, 10:30:14 AM »

The Conservatives and UKIP backed Wood Huh

This is very interesting now - they have 28 days to elect someone, or there will be a second election. This may benefit of Plaid more than Labour, unless Labour change their leader in Wales, IMO.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #12 on: May 11, 2016, 10:45:42 AM »

Looking through Twitter, a lot of people are suggesting that Plaid did a deal with the Tories and UKIP - it appears that they haven't done a deal. Leanne Wood was put forward as a nomination from Plaid (which they are perfectly entitled to do) and the Tories and UKIP voted for her.

It'll be very interesting to see how the media spin this.
Logged
Clyde1998
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,936
United Kingdom


« Reply #13 on: May 11, 2016, 12:26:38 PM »

Tories and Kippers are both claiming that little chats were held before the vote...
Plaid are now saying that the chats they had with both parties was purely to tell them that they were going to nominate Wood for FM and was not about getting the to vote for her...
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 12 queries.