PPP National Poll: Bush drops to 5th place, Clinton remains far ahead
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 01:58:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  PPP National Poll: Bush drops to 5th place, Clinton remains far ahead
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: PPP National Poll: Bush drops to 5th place, Clinton remains far ahead  (Read 1205 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 13, 2015, 11:27:47 AM »

GOP:

Scott Walker ................................................... 18%
Marco Rubio ................................................... 13%
Mike Huckabee ............................................... 12%
Ben Carson..................................................... 12%
Jeb Bush......................................................... 11%
Ted Cruz ......................................................... 10%
Rand Paul ....................................................... 9%
Chris Christie .................................................. 5%
Rick Perry ....................................................... 2%
Someone else / Not sure ................................ 7%

DEMs:

Hillary Clinton.................................................. 63%
Bernie Sanders ............................................... 13%
Jim Webb........................................................ 6%
Lincoln Chafee................................................ 5%
Martin O'Malley............................................... 2%
Not sure .......................................................... 11%

...

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

...

Public Policy Polling® interviewed 685 Republican primary voters and 600 Democratic primary voters nationally from May 7th to 10th. The margins of error for the surveys are +/- 3.7% and +/- 4.0% respectively. 80% of interviews for the poll were conducted over the phone with 20% interviewed over the internet to reach respondents who don’t have landline telephones.

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2015/PPP_Release_National_51315.pdf
Logged
Gallium
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 270
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2015, 11:32:03 AM »

Lincoln Chafee................................................ 5%
Martin O'Malley............................................... 2%

ayy lmao
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2015, 11:36:11 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Huh
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,743
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2015, 11:37:47 AM »

Lincoln Chafee................................................ 5%
Martin O'Malley............................................... 2%

ayy lmao

Webb at 6% is pretty crazy too.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,707
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2015, 11:38:25 AM »

Poor Rand.
Logged
mds32
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,090
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 13, 2015, 11:38:58 AM »

How the heck does Chafee manage to take 5%? Sanders at 13% seems about right. I think he could get to 20% if he remains the only serious contender in the field before the debates.
Logged
Skye
yeah_93
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,581
Venezuela


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 13, 2015, 11:53:32 AM »

They stopped polling Warren and Biden. Good.

Also, I'm surprised at Walker's resilience in staying at the top of these polls.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,707
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 13, 2015, 11:54:09 AM »

Also, over half of the electorate says electability is more important than conservatism:

When it comes to the Republican nominee for
President are you more concerned with having
the candidate who is the most conservative on
the issues, or the one who has the best chance
of beating a Democrat in the general election?

 38% More concerned with having the candidate
who is the most conservative on the issues....

 53% More concerned with having the candidate
who has the best chance of beating a
Democrat in the general election ....................

Not sure 10%


Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 13, 2015, 12:02:09 PM »

If Walker has an excellent announcement speech, he could be up huge heading in the fall.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 13, 2015, 12:10:44 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

lol
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 13, 2015, 12:20:03 PM »

Scott Walker is the only guy who has more support from Republicans than Bernie Sanders has from Democrats.
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,743
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 13, 2015, 12:39:13 PM »

I looked at the results from PPP's poll of Arizona from last week and I was surprised to find that Sanders does better in Arizona than nationwide. https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=212364.0
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 13, 2015, 01:18:17 PM »

I looked at the results from PPP's poll of Arizona from last week and I was surprised to find that Sanders does better in Arizona than nationwide. https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=212364.0

I'm guessing Sanders is single digits in the South, so virtually everywhere else will be above average.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,937


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 13, 2015, 01:20:42 PM »


Eh, he's basically tied for second.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,471
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 13, 2015, 01:21:49 PM »

Thought Sanders would be doing a little bit better honestly.

I'm surprised Webb and Chafee are actually even as high up as they are.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2015, 01:27:40 PM »

Thought Sanders would be doing a little bit better honestly.

80% of interviews were done over landline phones. I'm the thinking 2016 is going to be the year when pollsters finally get a nasty bite in the rear end.
Logged
Gallium
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 270
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: May 13, 2015, 01:54:02 PM »

Thought Sanders would be doing a little bit better honestly.

80% of interviews were done over landline phones. I'm the thinking 2016 is going to be the year when pollsters finally get a nasty bite in the rear end.
One of the reasons the British polling industry collectively f[ink]ed up last week was because they didn't do enough landline interviews. The landline polling proved by far the most accurate, and I'd still trust it in the US.
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,743
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2015, 02:26:49 PM »

Thought Sanders would be doing a little bit better honestly.

80% of interviews were done over landline phones. I'm the thinking 2016 is going to be the year when pollsters finally get a nasty bite in the rear end.
One of the reasons the British polling industry collectively f[ink]ed up last week was because they didn't do enough landline interviews. The landline polling proved by far the most accurate, and I'd still trust it in the US.

The high number of millennials (and even older folks) without landlines makes me a bit skeptical. We'll see how things shake out.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,937


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: May 13, 2015, 02:29:29 PM »

Thought Sanders would be doing a little bit better honestly.

80% of interviews were done over landline phones. I'm the thinking 2016 is going to be the year when pollsters finally get a nasty bite in the rear end.

That already happened in 2014!
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: May 13, 2015, 02:49:57 PM »

I looked at the results from PPP's poll of Arizona from last week and I was surprised to find that Sanders does better in Arizona than nationwide. https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=212364.0

Arizona has a bunch of hippies.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: May 13, 2015, 03:04:41 PM »


Yes but he doesn't seem to have benefited from the same kind of post announce bounce as others
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: May 13, 2015, 04:32:23 PM »

Why is PPP the only pollster to ever show Chafee at more than 0 or 1 percent?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: May 13, 2015, 04:34:27 PM »

Why is PPP the only pollster to ever show Chafee at more than 0 or 1 percent?

Aren't PPP polls automated? If they're doing something like "If Chafee, press 1. If Clinton, press 2. If O'Malley, press 3, etc..." then about 5% of people are always going to accidentally press 1 while trying to hang up or something.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: May 13, 2015, 04:37:31 PM »

Why is PPP the only pollster to ever show Chafee at more than 0 or 1 percent?

Aren't PPP polls automated? If they're doing something like "If Chafee, press 1. If Clinton, press 2. If O'Malley, press 3, etc..." then about 5% of people are always going to accidentally press 1 while trying to hang up or something.

PPP does seem to have a problem with not randomizing their responses. King noticed this as well, Walker is always listed last and he tends to do better in PPP polls than in others.
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,743
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: May 13, 2015, 05:59:19 PM »

Why is PPP the only pollster to ever show Chafee at more than 0 or 1 percent?

Aren't PPP polls automated? If they're doing something like "If Chafee, press 1. If Clinton, press 2. If O'Malley, press 3, etc..." then about 5% of people are always going to accidentally press 1 while trying to hang up or something.

PPP does seem to have a problem with not randomizing their responses. King noticed this as well, Walker is always listed last and he tends to do better in PPP polls than in others.

That might also explain Webb's 6% as well.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 13 queries.