Hillary to Hire More Damage Control Experts

[bobloblaw]

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/hillary-clintons-damage-control-operation-gets-more-troops-2015-05-13

Not hiring more policy analysts but more damage control experts. All you need to know about this slimy campaign and corrupt and criminal individual.

[King]

I guess it would be more honorable if she sat back and took her beating Kerry style.

[bobloblaw]

I guess it would be more honorable if she sat back and took her beating Kerry style.

the point is she needs them in the first place.

[King]

I guess it would be more honorable if she sat back and took her beating Kerry style.

the point is she needs them in the first place.

Every Presidential campaign has a rapid response team and outside PACs to defend their record.

The American Bridge 21st Century, which this article concerns, was actually founded in 2011 for Obama. It's just switching its focus to Clinton.  Romney used a PAC called Restore Our Future to combat Newt and later Obama's attacks on Bain Capital.

[bobloblaw]

I guess it would be more honorable if she sat back and took her beating Kerry style.

the point is she needs them in the first place.

Every Presidential campaign has a rapid response team and outside PACs to defend their record.

The American Bridge 21st Century, which this article concerns, was actually founded in 2011 for Obama. It's just switching its focus to Clinton.  Romney used a PAC called Restore Our Future to combat Newt and later Obama's attacks on Bain Capital.

yes, but she needs MORE. They know they have a bad candidate and need MORE damage control.

[King]

I guess it would be more honorable if she sat back and took her beating Kerry style.

the point is she needs them in the first place.

Every Presidential campaign has a rapid response team and outside PACs to defend their record.

The American Bridge 21st Century, which this article concerns, was actually founded in 2011 for Obama. It's just switching its focus to Clinton.  Romney used a PAC called Restore Our Future to combat Newt and later Obama's attacks on Bain Capital.

yes, but she needs MORE. They know they have a bad candidate and need MORE damage control.

Obviously she needs more. She's being attacked more.

A bad candidate would be a candidate who isn't prepared to do this.

[Lincoln Republican]

[Beet]

The constant attempts to shove Hillary-hatred down everyone's throats will backfire if groups like this can put out a coherent rebuttal. People don't like being told how to think.

[WVdemocrat]

The constant attempts to shove Hillary-hatred down everyone's throats will backfire if groups like this can put out a coherent rebuttal. People don't like being told how to think.

[IceSpear]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

[Pandaguineapig]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

[IceSpear]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

I agree, it is funny how epically they're failing.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

That actually is one of the media's main goals these days, and I'm glad it is.

[Pandaguineapig]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

I agree, it is funny how epically they're failing.

It's also funny how desperately some people desperately try to defend Hillary against the foundation stuff but were also the same people who demanded to see Mitt Romney's tax returns in 2012

[Ebsy]

Most of the foundation stuff would have gotten a libel conviction in any other country.

[Pandaguineapig]

Most of the foundation stuff would have gotten a libel conviction in any other country.

Lol no, given that McDonnell from Virginia got convicted on roughly the same circumstantial evidence

[IceSpear]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

I agree, it is funny how epically they're failing.

It's also funny how desperately some people desperately try to defend Hillary against the foundation stuff but were also the same people who demanded to see Mitt Romney's tax returns in 2012

The media did harass Romney over the tax returns, but they eventually dropped the subject after a couple months and let him get away with not releasing them. Do you think they will EVER drop the subject of "emailgate" or the Clinton Foundation?

[Pandaguineapig]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

I agree, it is funny how epically they're failing.

It's also funny how desperately some people desperately try to defend Hillary against the foundation stuff but were also the same people who demanded to see Mitt Romney's tax returns in 2012

The media did harass Romney over the tax returns, but they eventually dropped the subject after a couple months and let him get away with not releasing them. Do you think they will EVER drop the subject of "emailgate" or the Clinton Foundation?

Does it not bother you in the slightest that Bob McDonnell was convicted on the same level of circumstantial evidence that exists in the Clinton foundation scandal, or do you still believe that everything they do is pure?

[Mr. Smith]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

I agree, it is funny how epically they're failing.

It's also funny how desperately some people desperately try to defend Hillary against the foundation stuff but were also the same people who demanded to see Mitt Romney's tax returns in 2012

The media did harass Romney over the tax returns, but they eventually dropped the subject after a couple months and let him get away with not releasing them. Do you think they will EVER drop the subject of "emailgate" or the Clinton Foundation?

Sure, considering they dropped Benghazi...took 'em too long, but it happened.

Just wait and another "scandal" will pop up for the media to attack Clinton on, and it'll continue that way until she's lame-ducked...or loses election.

[IceSpear]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

Lol

I agree, it is funny how epically they're failing.

It's also funny how desperately some people desperately try to defend Hillary against the foundation stuff but were also the same people who demanded to see Mitt Romney's tax returns in 2012

The media did harass Romney over the tax returns, but they eventually dropped the subject after a couple months and let him get away with not releasing them. Do you think they will EVER drop the subject of "emailgate" or the Clinton Foundation?

Does it not bother you in the slightest that Bob McDonnell was convicted on the same level of circumstantial evidence that exists in the Clinton foundation scandal, or do you still believe that everything they do is pure?

Was there not actual public testimony about McDonnell's involvement in quid pro quo? The only thing against the Clinton Foundation is theories. Many of the claims of quid pro quo so far have been debunked. For example, the uranium mining deal which Hillary supposedly pushed through to benefit a Clinton Foundation donor, when there's no evidence whatsoever she was personally involved and the deal needed approval from nine different government agencies outside of the State department.

[Mister Mets]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

What percentage of the American media do you think prefers Jeb Bush or Scott Walker as President to Hillary Clinton?

[IceSpear]

Yes, when the media makes it their main goal to destroy your campaign, you tend to need more people assigned to push back on their narratives.

What percentage of the American media do you think prefers Jeb Bush or Scott Walker as President to Hillary Clinton?

It's not about preference, just personal destruction.

[CountryClassSF]

Saul Alinsky Clinton

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I guess it would be more honorable if she sat back and took her beating Kerry style.

the point is she needs them in the first place.

Every Presidential campaign has a rapid response team and outside PACs to defend their record.

The American Bridge 21st Century, which this article concerns, was actually founded in 2011 for Obama. It's just switching its focus to Clinton.  Romney used a PAC called Restore Our Future to combat Newt and later Obama's attacks on Bain Capital.

yes, but she needs MORE. They know they have a bad candidate and need MORE damage control.

Obviously she needs more. She's being attacked more.

A bad candidate would be a candidate who isn't prepared to do this.

I know she's being attacked a lot, but is she really being attacked any more than Gore or Kerry? The media was quite biased against Gore.

[King]

Yes and neither did anything about it and lost.