Ceiling for Republicans and Democrats
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 02:28:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Ceiling for Republicans and Democrats
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ceiling for Republicans and Democrats  (Read 509 times)
OSR stands with Israel
Computer89
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,684


Political Matrix
E: 3.42, S: 2.61

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 14, 2015, 01:06:38 AM »

Republicans



I did not set percantage in each state so forget it

Kasich 338
Sanders 200


Democrats


Hilary 374
Cruz 174
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2015, 10:01:27 AM »

Republicans



I did not set percantage in each state so forget it

Kasich 338
Sanders 200


Democrats


Hilary 374
Cruz 174

MN has a better GOP PVI than MI.
Logged
bobloblaw
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,018
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2015, 10:02:26 AM »

Republicans



I did not set percantage in each state so forget it

Kasich 338
Sanders 200


Democrats


Hilary 374
Cruz 174

GA is inelastic. Cruz would win GA.
Logged
RINO Tom
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,016
United States


Political Matrix
E: 2.45, S: -0.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2015, 12:58:43 PM »

Republican blowout:



Democratic blowout:



Let's all keep in mind just how much of a blowout a party's CEILING would be.
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2015, 01:07:46 PM »

Republicans



I did not set percantage in each state so forget it

Kasich 338
Sanders 200


Democrats


Hilary 374
Cruz 174
Looks about right. Even MO and MT might be winnable in a best-case Dem scenario.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,858
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2015, 01:58:20 PM »


Republican blowout:



Democratic blowout:



Michigan has too many blacks to go Republican in a Presidential election, and Minnesota does not swing much.  A Kentucky poll showed Rand Paul tied with Hillary Clinton.  Clinton-but-not-Obama states could stay that way -- but Hillary wins them.

Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2015, 02:06:08 PM »

Yeah, if it didn't bother to elect its native son Gore in 2000, it's not going for Hillary.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2015, 02:10:41 PM »

Yeah, if it didn't bother to elect its native son Gore in 2000, it's not going for Hillary.
I think Arkansas and Louisiana are off the table as well. I could see Kentucky, West Virginia, and Montana being close in a landslide for Clinton.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2015, 02:21:11 PM »

Imagine you ran a crazy computer simulation that could realistically play out the election 1000 times in a randomized way.  Is the 95th percentile result "the ceiling" or is the 99.9th percentile result if you ran the simulation 1 million times the ceiling?

Because, imagine if Jeb Bush wins a long bruising primary, he runs a bad campaign and has a few serious corruption scandals, Rand Paul runs as a third party candidate, Jeb Bush kills a pedestrian in a drunk driving accident and it comes out that Jeb Bush is a closeted homosexual.  In that situation, the Republican would get zero electoral votes, but that's extremely, extremely unlikely. 
Logged
SingingAnalyst
mathstatman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,639
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2015, 02:26:41 PM »

Imagine you ran a crazy computer simulation that could realistically play out the election 1000 times in a randomized way.  Is the 95th percentile result "the ceiling" or is the 99.9th percentile result if you ran the simulation 1 million times the ceiling?

Because, imagine if Jeb Bush wins a long bruising primary, he runs a bad campaign and has a few serious corruption scandals, Rand Paul runs as a third party candidate, Jeb Bush kills a pedestrian in a drunk driving accident and it comes out that Jeb Bush is a closeted homosexual.  In that situation, the Republican would get zero electoral votes, but that's extremely, extremely unlikely. 
Only if UT gets swallowed by quicksand. But I like your outside-6-sigma way of thinking.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2015, 02:32:26 PM »

Imagine you ran a crazy computer simulation that could realistically play out the election 1000 times in a randomized way.  Is the 95th percentile result "the ceiling" or is the 99.9th percentile result if you ran the simulation 1 million times the ceiling?

Because, imagine if Jeb Bush wins a long bruising primary, he runs a bad campaign and has a few serious corruption scandals, Rand Paul runs as a third party candidate, Jeb Bush kills a pedestrian in a drunk driving accident and it comes out that Jeb Bush is a closeted homosexual.  In that situation, the Republican would get zero electoral votes, but that's extremely, extremely unlikely. 
Only if UT gets swallowed by quicksand. But I like your outside-6-sigma way of thinking.

I meant the third party candidate, Rand Paul, would win the solid Republican states.
Logged
MATTROSE94
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,803
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -6.43

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2015, 02:44:41 PM »

Republicans



I did not set percantage in each state so forget it

Kasich 338
Sanders 200


Democrats


Hilary 374
Cruz 174
I agree for the most part, though I also feel that New Mexico, Minnesota, and Maine statewide could be in play for the Republicans in a Kasich vs Sanders election. In the Democratic map, Hillary Clinton could potentially make Arkansas, Missouri, Indiana, and Montana closer than in 2012, but ultimately Ted Cruz would still carry all four states without breaking too much of a sweat.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 12 queries.