Alleviating Rural Poverty Act of 2015 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 03:08:35 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Alleviating Rural Poverty Act of 2015 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Alleviating Rural Poverty Act of 2015  (Read 4138 times)
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« on: May 15, 2015, 04:13:55 PM »

I'm interested in Blair's idea of a eco-friendly bus being used for this service? I'd love for us to to mandate a provision for one of those in this bill.

In addition, I think we should subsidize the bus service for people who do not have personal automobiles. That way, we might be able to reduce their usage altogether. I'd love to do something like that for urban areas too, but I'm not sure we'd be intruding on local authority that way.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2015, 09:15:37 PM »

No one supports giving public transportation vouchers to those who do not own vehicles?
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #2 on: May 21, 2015, 09:58:41 PM »

Keep in mind the voucher would just be a discounted price for public transportation. Maybe 15% off?
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2015, 04:03:12 PM »

Instead of yet another bill which gives funds to the regions, why can't this be a federally administered program? As long as there was some coordination with the appropriate local authorities, I don't think it would be too much of an issue.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2015, 09:21:44 PM »

Well, it depends on whether we'd provide an alternative transportation method (such as discounted taxiing) or something for the areas that people feel are not worthy of public bus transportation.

As for divvying up money to the regions again, I don't think that's necessary. This is something the DoIA can do on a more consistent basis throughout the country in coordination with local authorities. Not a fan of giving lump sums to the regions.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #5 on: May 30, 2015, 07:06:23 AM »

What exactly are the constitutional issues that would arise from making a program like this federal?
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #6 on: June 06, 2015, 07:33:03 AM »

I'm fine with parts 2 and 3, but my issue with part 1 is I don't see how that'll necessarily reduce costs for  travelers in rural areas. In addition, they could just get around the law by extending existing routes 100 miles by following a snaking pattern through a big metropolitan area or such.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #7 on: June 08, 2015, 09:47:51 AM »

How about they get a subsidy if they create routes in pre-approved areas designated by the DoIA?
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2015, 10:09:29 PM »

Does anyone have any amendments to propose to this?
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #9 on: June 17, 2015, 03:54:53 PM »

I'll sponsor Bore's amendment. Senators have 24 hours to object.
Logged
Talleyrand
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,518


« Reply #10 on: June 18, 2015, 04:04:36 PM »

The amendment has been adopted.

I suspend Senate rules and remove the t behind costs in clause 3. Senators have 24 hours to object.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.