Who is handling the Iraq War question the best?

[Higgs]

And how will this affect the primary and the general

[t_host1]

 ...well, after having a week to think about it; thank God dubya was president during the 911 era and we already knew what we know now about the Obama Iraq war, The Last Supper.

[publicunofficial]

Paul's the only one who has equivocally said he would not invade Iraq, which is the only right answer.

[136or142]

Baghdad Bob.

[HAnnA MArin County]

Where's the option for the unrestrained warmongering neoliberal corporatist?

[Bakersfield Uber Alles]

Definitely Senator Sanders.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Bush really screwed that one up, and Rubio is a completely insane warmonger, so Paul wins by default.

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Paul.

[Likely Voter]

Christie, actually

[pbrower2a]

By default, Rand Paul. Most other Republicans have chosen to defend the Great Mistake of George W. Bush. 

[ProgCon]

Rand Paul has had handled this question the best, obviously. He's the only candidate who has been consistently opposed to the intervention.

What I find curious is that the others are stumbling over the question of "knowing what we know now, would you have invaded Iraq?" The answers have all demonstrated one thing - none of the leading GOP candidates learned anything from the disastrous Bush II foreign policy. They learned to answer that question with a "no since we had misleading intel." That misses the major issue here - would they pre-emptively invade a country to prevent or remove its chemical or WMD program? Yes, yes they would. And that's all we really need to know.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Paul

Jeb created the opening when he clearly hasnt learned the mistakes of his brother.

Hilary has stayed away from controversy; and right to lay low and let Paul lead the charge against Bush on that one.

But, it was a powerplay and created an opening Hilary needed; to even out Libya questions, without being in it.

[bobloblaw]

Kind of a biased poll.