Putin Has Won
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 08:45:42 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Putin Has Won
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Putin Has Won  (Read 4188 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,568
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 24, 2015, 06:28:43 PM »

Presumably the door into the European Union is still open to Balkan states like Albania, and those remaining countries (like Serbia) that used to comprise the former Yugoslavia:
 
EU states reluctant to annoy Kremlin

By Michael Birnbaum  MAY 23, 2015

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Swedish Rainbow Capitalist Cheese
JOHN91043353
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,570
Sweden


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 25, 2015, 06:17:58 PM »

Those doors being shut probably has more to do with the current economic situation in the European Union and the bad business it would be for the Union to allow more poor countries in at the moment, than anything to do with Russia.

By large part, the recent development with Romania, and the large social migration of poor people to other European countries, has acted as a deterrent to let other countries, with similar economic problems into the union.

The trade limitations the Union has agreed to against Russia, is probably a far greater headache to Putin, than Albania (which unfortunately has little significance in the world stage) edging closer to the EU. Thus I find it hard to believe the thesis of this article.     
Logged
Citizen (The) Doctor
ArchangelZero
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,392
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 25, 2015, 09:30:59 PM »

Doesn't this presume that the Russian economy will remain stable long enough for such gains to be solidified? I think that's a rather large presumption to make.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,905


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 25, 2015, 11:24:28 PM »

The E.U. needs to focus on democratizing and streamlining its internal institutions before accepting new members. The whole fetish towards expansionism of the past 10-15 years over consolidation might be counterproductive.

Ironically we've seen this in the response to Putin himself: when all 28 member states have to agree unanimously to any action, the E.U. becomes like late 18th century Poland, where it's impossible to get anything done. That allows dictators like Putin to take advantage.

And that's even before considering the problems with democratic legitimacy that have emerged since the Euro crisis. The more members there are, the harder it will be to consolidate and the greater chance the whole thing will simply crack up one day.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,772


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2015, 11:26:42 PM »

It's not like anyone in the EU was seriously considering expansion now, given the economic crisis. Russia is taking credit for ending EU expansion, but EU expansion's been dead for years. If Croatia's ascension hadn't already been scheduled before the crisis, it would have stopped at the EU27...as is, the EU28 is not going to change for a long time, unless it changes by shrinking. (Or I suppose the secession of Scotland or Catalonia as EU member states, but that doesn't really count as expansion)
Logged
bballrox4717
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2015, 08:23:30 PM »

No, Russia has already lost. Rather than have former Warsaw Pact countries be neutral, they are all part of the EU and NATO, which has entered former Soviet territory in the Baltics. Russia is angry because NATO is essentially treating it like Cold War era Germany: a dismembered state that should not be allowed to regain its former power. It can't project any national power when its borders are essentially what it was after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which was completely humiliating to Russia. The only reason why Russia is even remotely threatening to the U.S. is because of its missiles and nuclear power.

Russians completely resent this. It's why Putin is so popular. He stands up to the western consensus on cultural issues and stands up to the west when they go further into Soviet territory by trying to add Ukraine to the EU and NATO.  I don't think people quite understand that Putin is essentially using Hitler's political tactics to gain power without the crazy Nazi ideology. It's why he's so dangerous. Putin is a good enough politician to gain international and domestic favor for his actions, yet is a cold enough rational actor to realize there are lines he can't cross.

I just hope western leaders find a political solution to this before Putin is able to divide the EU and NATO enough that he can start pseudo-invading NATO countries like the Baltics. Because if international leaders cannot coordinate a quick response, they are going to have to choose between war and appeasement. We seriously cannot let it get to that point, because Putin will actually start winning.
Logged
Platypus
hughento
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,478
Australia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2015, 10:21:18 PM »

I'd be very, very surprised if Russian involvement in the Baltics didn't lead to war. If the west just allowed it to happen, then the whole point of NATO is lost, and the EU is proved to be weak.

Nobody wants to go to war, but they absolutely would if there were Russian tanks rolling into Tallinn.
Logged
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2015, 11:47:54 PM »

No, Russia has already lost. Rather than have former Warsaw Pact countries be neutral, they are all part of the EU and NATO, which has entered former Soviet territory in the Baltics.

right.  that's why Putin referred to the collapse of the USSR as "a great geopolitical catastrophe."  what you and I call "EU" and "NATO", Russia calls it Western aggression.  (remember, Russia has been demolished by Western European invasions 3 times since 1805).  Putin is on a mission to get at least some of that "buffer" territory back.
Logged
bballrox4717
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 949


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -3.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 29, 2015, 07:46:55 PM »

I'd be very, very surprised if Russian involvement in the Baltics didn't lead to war. If the west just allowed it to happen, then the whole point of NATO is lost, and the EU is proved to be weak.

Nobody wants to go to war, but they absolutely would if there were Russian tanks rolling into Tallinn.

Your first point is literally exactly what Putin wants: he seeks to politically play EU countries and the US against each other to the point that nobody sees the worth in defending the Baltic countries. If NATO cannot guarantee the safety of every country in it, then it will collapse, which allows Russia to pursue a much more aggressive foreign policy.

No, Russia has already lost. Rather than have former Warsaw Pact countries be neutral, they are all part of the EU and NATO, which has entered former Soviet territory in the Baltics.

right.  that's why Putin referred to the collapse of the USSR as "a great geopolitical catastrophe."  what you and I call "EU" and "NATO", Russia calls it Western aggression.  (remember, Russia has been demolished by Western European invasions 3 times since 1805).  Putin is on a mission to get at least some of that "buffer" territory back.

It's not even about buffer territory at this point. Buffer territories are pointless with modern warfare. Putin, like many non-western leaders, see the US as a tyrannical, unipolar world power. They despise the fact that the US will act in a major power's sphere of influence without any real consequence. They think to themselves, what business does the US have in making Slavic, Middle Eastern, or Asian countries liberal democracies? To Russia (and also the Chinese), it insults their very sovereignty.

The real goal of Russia (and once again, China, even if they're off topic on this subject), is undo the current global order so that they don't have to suffer the embarrassment of foreign interference with their policies. It's a revanchist movement at heart, where the actual goals mean nothing towards the actual strength of the state.
Logged
Dan the Roman
liberalrepublican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,540
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2015, 12:20:08 PM »

I'd be very, very surprised if Russian involvement in the Baltics didn't lead to war. If the west just allowed it to happen, then the whole point of NATO is lost, and the EU is proved to be weak.

Nobody wants to go to war, but they absolutely would if there were Russian tanks rolling into Tallinn.

Russian tanks wouldn't roll into Tallinn. Volunteers would visit Narva.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2015, 08:53:40 PM »

It's not like anyone in the EU was seriously considering expansion now, given the economic crisis. Russia is taking credit for ending EU expansion, but EU expansion's been dead for years. If Croatia's ascension hadn't already been scheduled before the crisis, it would have stopped at the EU27...as is, the EU28 is not going to change for a long time, unless it changes by shrinking. (Or I suppose the secession of Scotland or Catalonia as EU member states, but that doesn't really count as expansion)

Some of the Balkan countries should be admitted in a few years.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,267
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: May 31, 2015, 08:14:48 AM »

Well Macedonia has that really weird naming dispute with Greece, and I think the Kosovo situation is too messy for Serbia/Kosovo to get in for a while.

Ultimately Russia, Ukraine and Belarus are far too large and scary to be fully integrated into Europe as part of the economic union in the near future.
Logged
swl
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 581
France


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: May 31, 2015, 01:36:45 PM »

It seems pretty clear that no one will join the EU before 2020, and before 2030 only Balkans country have a prospect to join (if you except Iceland or Norway suddenly changing their mind). The EU is still trying to digest the enlargements of 2005-2007, as shown by the UK referendum on membership.
Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,306


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 31, 2015, 04:12:56 PM »

It seems pretty clear that no one will join the EU before 2020, and before 2030 only Balkans country have a prospect to join (if you except Iceland or Norway suddenly changing their mind). The EU is still trying to digest the enlargements of 2005-2007, as shown by the UK referendum on membership.


Yes we will likely see Serbia and Montenegro as EU members before 2030, Macedonia too if Greece and it can get over their little conflict.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: May 31, 2015, 05:19:33 PM »

Yes we will likely see Serbia and Montenegro as EU members before 2030, Macedonia too if Greece and it can get over their little conflict.

So Macedonia has no chance.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: May 31, 2015, 09:31:52 PM »

Yes we will likely see Serbia and Montenegro as EU members before 2030, Macedonia too if Greece and it can get over their little conflict.

So Macedonia has no chance.

Maybe they'd change their name.
Logged
smoltchanov
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,381
Russian Federation


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: June 01, 2015, 04:17:11 AM »

No, Russia has already lost. Rather than have former Warsaw Pact countries be neutral, they are all part of the EU and NATO, which has entered former Soviet territory in the Baltics. Russia is angry because NATO is essentially treating it like Cold War era Germany: a dismembered state that should not be allowed to regain its former power. It can't project any national power when its borders are essentially what it was after the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, which was completely humiliating to Russia. The only reason why Russia is even remotely threatening to the U.S. is because of its missiles and nuclear power.

Russians completely resent this. It's why Putin is so popular. He stands up to the western consensus on cultural issues and stands up to the west when they go further into Soviet territory by trying to add Ukraine to the EU and NATO.  I don't think people quite understand that Putin is essentially using Hitler's political tactics to gain power without the crazy Nazi ideology. It's why he's so dangerous. Putin is a good enough politician to gain international and domestic favor for his actions, yet is a cold enough rational actor to realize there are lines he can't cross.

I just hope western leaders find a political solution to this before Putin is able to divide the EU and NATO enough that he can start pseudo-invading NATO countries like the Baltics. Because if international leaders cannot coordinate a quick response, they are going to have to choose between war and appeasement. We seriously cannot let it get to that point, because Putin will actually start winning.

+100. I say that as a Russian living in Moscow))))))
Logged
ingemann
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,306


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: June 01, 2015, 02:52:37 PM »

Yes we will likely see Serbia and Montenegro as EU members before 2030, Macedonia too if Greece and it can get over their little conflict.

So Macedonia has no chance.

Maybe they'd change their name.

...or the Greek economy can collapse to the point that they focus on other things.

Through I will say, we may think the entire strife is complete idiocy. But we have to remember that both countries lies on the Balkans, and the Serbs gave Macedonia its name to push a claim to Greek Macedonia which had Slavic plurality at the time (today most are assimilated, but there's still a significant minority in Greek Macedonia). As such it's not without reason that the Greek try to weaken the Macedonian claims to Greek territory. It's still somewhat silly when we look at the population difference.
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,708


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: June 01, 2015, 03:09:41 PM »

Russian tanks wouldn't roll into Tallinn. Volunteers would visit Narva.

And NATO forces would kill them all and Russia would do nothing meaningful.

There will be no Russian expansion into NATO/EU countries without a major war.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,772


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2015, 04:07:38 PM »

Macedonia should just change its name to West Bulgaria and end the name controversy, it'd make everyone happy.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.053 seconds with 12 queries.