Should Charles Manson have been granted parole?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

He was denied parole in 2012. He will not be eligible again until 2027, where if he's still alive he'd be 92.

[Goldwater]

No, he should be dead.

[Stand With Israel. Crush Hamas]

He's a good example of someone who, even at his advanced age, could very well still be a threat.

Even without that, his crimes were monstrous enough to ensure that he should never be released in any capacity, since he lucked into no death penalty.

[James Monroe]

No(sane)

[OSR stands with Israel]

He was denied parole in 2012. He will not be eligible again until 2027, where if he's still alive he'd be 92.

He should have gotten the death penealty

[Rockefeller GOP]

No, he should be dead.

[H. Ross Peron]

He was denied parole in 2012. He will not be eligible again until 2027, where if he's still alive he'd be 92.

He should have gotten the death penealty

[Dancing with Myself]

He did have the death penalty actually at one time but once Cali banned it his sentence got knocked down to Life.

He should never be let go for two reasons: 1. He would still be crazy and do something to someone no matter how old he is, and 2. He's stated several times he hates the real world and would rather stay inside the rest of his life because it's all he knows. Why let him out if he doesn't want to go?

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

No; the guy's parole hearings are hilarious year after year.

[Mr. Smith]

He was denied parole in 2012. He will not be eligible again until 2027, where if he's still alive he'd be 92.

He should have gotten the death penealty

[SATW]

No, he should be dead.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Neither I nor anyone in this thread knows enough to answer this question. I trust the parole committee's decision, though.

[TDAS04]

No.