Which Senators would you really like to see lose next year?

[MT Treasurer]

In the primary or general.

For me:

Mark Kirk
John McCain
Chuck Schumer

in that order.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Portman; McCain; Johnson and Kirk

[Xing]

Mainly Johnson, though I'd LMAO if Paul lost.

[Ebsy]

Burr, Johnson, and McCain.

[Vega]

Paul
Rubio
Johnson

[ElectionsGuy]

This, of course, does not mean I think the replacements are better.

Ayotte
Blumenthal
Burr
Kirk
McCain
Rubio
Schumer

[Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon]

1. Schumer
2. Leahy
3. Johnson
4. Bennet
5. McCain
6. Toomey
7. Schatz

[Free Bird]

WANT to lose?

1. McCain in the Primary
2. Burr
3. Schumer

[publicunofficial]

1. Johnson (I dislike him, and love his challenger. Easy pick)
2. McCain
3. Ayotte
4. Kirk
5. Schumer (In the primary)


Burr and Portman are inoffensive, Toomey is decent, and Paul's voice is one I appreciate in the Senate.

[Nyvin]

1. Johnson
2. Ayotte
3. Burr
4. McCain
5. Kirk

[Oak Hills]

Johnson's the only one that sticks out.  Otherwise, I just generically hope that Republicans will lose.

[SATW]

Bennet
whoever the dem will be in NV
Blumenthal

[Senate Minority Leader Lord Voldemort]

Johnson
Kirk
Toomey
Burr
Ayotte
Portman
Blunt

In no particular order.

[Skye]

Bennet. Nothing personal though.
Schumer. No real chance, but it's good to dream.

[Aliens]

Johnson, Kirk, and Ayotte

[CapoteMonster]

1. Johnson (I dislike him, and love his challenger. Easy pick)
2. McCain
3. Ayotte
4. Kirk
5. Schumer (In the primary)


Burr and Portman are inoffensive, Toomey is decent, and Paul's voice is one I appreciate in the Senate.

[CountryClassSF]

Ideally: Bennet, Blumenthal, McCain (to a Republican),  Kirk (to a Republican), Murkowski (to a Republican), Paul (to a Republican), Blunt (to a Republican), Ayotte (to a Republican), Portman (to a Republican), Schumer, Leahy, Murray.

Realistically:
Bennet

[NeverAgain]

Ideally: Bennet, McCain (to a Republican),  Kirk (to a Republican), Murkowski (to a Republican), Paul (to a Republican), Blunt (to a Republican), Ayotte (to a Republican), Portman (to a Republican).

Realistically:
Bennet

Change 'to a Republican' to 'to a Democrat', and then we are ideologically entwined.

[smoltchanov]

Johnson. I would add such persons as Lee too, but - it's too unrealistic. But theoretically - all tea-parting Republicans would be on such my list automatically

[Zioneer]

Probably Johnson, Kirk, McCain, and a couple of others I can't remember.

I'm resigned to Mike Lee winning (because Utah), and if he and Paul actually pushed for criminal justice reform, that'd be great, and would make him a little better for me.

[morgieb]

Johnson, McCain, Ayotte, Kirk and Rubio. Portman and Toomey are meh (I find Kirk's faux-moderation more grating), and I can't see Kentucky doing any better than Paul, who at least is a much needed voice on foreign policy/civil liberty matters.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Bennet
whoever the dem will be in NV
Blumenthal

We are talking about senators, not senatorial candidates.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Portman & Toomey duo; plus Johnson& Kirk

[bballrox4717]

Johnson is really the only one that will cause me to be genuinely upset if he wins. The guy is such a hack and he doesn't even come close to being half the senator Feingold was. I'm also really heavily in favor of a Toomey loss but that's just because I'm a big Sestak fan. It isn't anything against Toomey in particular.

Obviously I really want Kirk and Ayotte to lose because it's the easiest way to take back the Senate but that's just the Democrat in me talking. They just don't even come close to the level of terrible like Johnson.

[The Dowager Mod]

Johnson
Toomey
Kirk