Paula Jones; Hillary unfit to be President
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 09:59:14 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Paula Jones; Hillary unfit to be President
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Paula Jones; Hillary unfit to be President  (Read 541 times)
NewYorkExpress
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,823
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 28, 2015, 04:36:23 PM »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3096653/Don-t-let-Bill-White-House-abused-women-ll-Paula-Jones-warns-against-voting-Hillary-lied-sex-case-cost-presidency.html

Paula Jones-the same woman who sued Bill Clinton for sexual harassment in 1994, has come out swinging, telling the Daily Mail that Hillary Clinton was "unfit to be President", that Bill was a "sexual abuser" and that the Clintons "don't care about what they do, who they run over to get to the top". She also stated that neither Hillary or Bill know the difference between "truth and lies".

Just how damaging is this to Hillary, both in a primary, and more importantly in a General Election?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,806


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2015, 04:46:32 PM »

Well, she is right. But all the Democrats here will call it a "FAUX scandal" and accuse the GOP of waging a war against women at the same time lol.

It's not a "faux scandal", but it's a well known scandal that applies to Bill, not Hillary. There are many things that the Clintons planned together, but Bill's philandering was by all accounts not one of them. I don't think he should have an official position in the WH, and if it came out that he had made advances to subordinates after leaving the WH, I would be quite disappointed.
Logged
MT Treasurer
IndyRep
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2015, 04:48:22 PM »

Well, she is right. But all the Democrats here will call it a "FAUX scandal" and accuse the GOP of waging a war against women at the same time lol.

It's not a "faux scandal", but it's a well known scandal that applies to Bill, not Hillary. There are many things that the Clintons planned together, but Bill's philandering was by all accounts not one of them. I don't think he should have an official position in the WH, and if it came out that he had made advances to subordinates after leaving the WH, I would be quite disappointed.

The issue here is another one: Did she know what was going on?
Logged
Blair
Blair2015
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,817
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2015, 04:57:50 PM »

Well, she is right. But all the Democrats here will call it a "FAUX scandal" and accuse the GOP of waging a war against women at the same time lol.

It's not a "faux scandal", but it's a well known scandal that applies to Bill, not Hillary. There are many things that the Clintons planned together, but Bill's philandering was by all accounts not one of them. I don't think he should have an official position in the WH, and if it came out that he had made advances to subordinates after leaving the WH, I would be quite disappointed.

The issue here is another one: Did she know what was going on?

Do you ask the same of Jackie O?

I'm literally one of the worst people about this-we give Clinton so much sh**t for stuff Bill did, but we all seem to ignore that Jackie O did the same for JFK for 3 years
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,841
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2015, 05:39:17 PM »

Just how damaging is this to Hillary, both in a primary, and more importantly in a General Election?

0 and 0.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,369


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2015, 05:53:13 PM »

Just how damaging is this to Hillary, both in a primary, and more importantly in a General Election?

Not at all. The Republican PR machine has thrown so many accusations at Hillary over the years and recently, that she'd practically have to be caught handing nuclear weapons over to the head of ISIS for anything to gain real traction with swing voters. 99% of "scandals" from now to election day are nothing but red meat for the base that hates her.

That's not to say that she hasn't done things that ought to hurt her, but that between the right-wing's endless attempts to turn everything into campaign-destroying wrongdoing and the sheer repugnance of the Republicans' positions to many voters, scandals aren't going to be doing much damage to candidate-presumptive Senator-Secretary Clinton. (She can still totally sink her own ship if she really screws up, though.)
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2015, 07:12:40 PM »

inb4 progressive liberals engage in rape apologism.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2015, 07:16:01 PM »

inb4 progressive liberals engage in rape apologism.

Paula Jones didn't even claim that she had sex with Bill Clinton.  Get your facts straight.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2015, 07:34:34 PM »

Every word Paula Jones says in this statement is the absolute truth.

Democrats simply do not want to face the facts or they simply don't care.
Logged
Orthogonian Society Treasurer
CommanderClash
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,561
Bermuda


Political Matrix
E: 0.32, S: 4.78

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2015, 07:39:54 PM »

Look, you don't get to the oval office without occasionally looking the other way while your husband rapes a couple of women. What difference at this point does it make?
Logged
MurrayBannerman
murraybannerman
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 756


Political Matrix
E: 5.55, S: -2.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2015, 08:43:56 PM »

Well, she is right. But all the Democrats here will call it a "FAUX scandal" and accuse the GOP of waging a war against women at the same time lol.

It's not a "faux scandal", but it's a well known scandal that applies to Bill, not Hillary. There are many things that the Clintons planned together, but Bill's philandering was by all accounts not one of them. I don't think he should have an official position in the WH, and if it came out that he had made advances to subordinates after leaving the WH, I would be quite disappointed.

The issue here is another one: Did she know what was going on?

Do you ask the same of Jackie O?

I'm literally one of the worst people about this-we give Clinton so much sh**t for stuff Bill did, but we all seem to ignore that Jackie O did the same for JFK for 3 years
Jackie O isn't/wasn't running for president.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 12 queries.